Hi Graham,
I ran the test and got an issue, but it was something different than
what JOdy was talking about. Anyways, I made a small change and the test
now passes for me.
Try it out and let me know if you still get an error. Perhaps could you
in include the stack trace of it?
Graham Davis wr
Justin, I've got a quick test that shows the error we have for this:
geotools\trunk\modules\extension\xsd\wps\src\test\java\org\geotools\wps\ExecuteTest.java
Graham.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hmmm.. this is not just an attribute, but an attribute with an anonymous
> type. Nasty. I have actual
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hmmm.. this is not just an attribute, but an attribute with an
> anonymous type. Nasty. I have actually never run into this case before
> so you might have stumbled upon a bug..
>
> Is there a test case i can run in the wps xml module?
No test cases yet; just breakpoint
Hmmm.. this is not just an attribute, but an attribute with an anonymous
type. Nasty. I have actually never run into this case before so you
might have stumbled upon a bug..
is there a test case i can run in the wps xml module?
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Hi Justin;
>
> I see some provision for hand
Hi Justin;
I see some provision for handling "attribute" bindings; the situation is
we have an attribute, called"method" below, that is an xs:string with a
restriction on the values (either GET or POST ).
- The EMF generator spits that out as an Java Enum MethodType
- And the generated parser is
