Cory Horner ha scritto:
> Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>> So with my api changes complete on trunk I believe there is nothing
>> keeping us from branching trunk to 2.4 and continuing with 2.5
>> development on trunk.
>
> What of the crazy 2.9, 3.0 plan? that sounded fun.
I liked it, me too...
>> I
Doh - I went through the list for 2.3.x - we need to go through the list
for 2.4.x :-(
Want to join me on IRC and we can figure out what to do one at a time?
Jody
> I just went through the bugs on IRC with andrea:
> - the website is marked as wont fix (please hand out the
> http://www.geotools.or
I just went through the bugs on IRC with andrea:
- the website is marked as wont fix (please hand out the
http://www.geotools.org/ address)
- the streaming renderer gobbling bugs is andrea's to deal with - but
for now I am marking it as trivial so we can get on with ...
...the 2.4-RC0 release.
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> So with my api changes complete on trunk I believe there is nothing
> keeping us from branching trunk to 2.4 and continuing with 2.5
> development on trunk.
What of the crazy 2.9, 3.0 plan? that sounded fun.
> If everyone is ok (please let us know) I would like to mak
And I am wondering about our two bugs? I would like to release 2.4-RC0
and make that the start of the 2.4.x branch. I went through a lot of the
bugs on Friday, as did Andrea. I even made the hit list of bugs visible
from the home page.
So Andrea where are we at? Is it time for the release candi
Hi all,
So with my api changes complete on trunk I believe there is nothing
keeping us from branching trunk to 2.4 and continuing with 2.5
development on trunk.
If everyone is ok (please let us know) I would like to make the official
call for people "get out of the pool" and to wrap up their c
