This is for the Quickstart app with the pom set up as shown on the web
page (see below)
[INFO] [dependency:tree]
[INFO] org.geotools.demo:example-standalone:jar:2.7-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] +- org.geotools:gt-main:jar:2.7-SNAPSHOT:compile
[INFO] | +- org.geotools:gt-api:jar:2.7-SNAPSHOT:compile
[INFO] |
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>> Hi Jody,
>>>
>>> If you get the chance I'd be grateful if you can review some changes
>>> that I've just made in the swing module.
>>>
>>> The reason that the Quickstart app needed JAI at runtime was because
>>> grid coverage classes were referenced directly by the Info
>> Hi Jody,
>>
>> If you get the chance I'd be grateful if you can review some changes
>> that I've just made in the swing module.
>>
>> The reason that the Quickstart app needed JAI at runtime was because
>> grid coverage classes were referenced directly by the InfoTool class.
>> I've think I've f
Hi Andrea
Thanks for the reply !
> I would be ok to just make it simpler and make JAI a transitive
> dependency. If someone really does not want it they can use
> Maven excludes to get rid of it.
Yes, that's true. But it's nice to avoid exclusions with the GeoTools
beginner examples because most
Michael Bedward ha scritto:
> Hi Jody,
>
> If you get the chance I'd be grateful if you can review some changes
> that I've just made in the swing module.
>
> The reason that the Quickstart app needed JAI at runtime was because
> grid coverage classes were referenced directly by the InfoTool clas
Hi Jody,
If you get the chance I'd be grateful if you can review some changes
that I've just made in the swing module.
The reason that the Quickstart app needed JAI at runtime was because
grid coverage classes were referenced directly by the InfoTool class.
I've think I've fixed this by hiding th
