On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
[email protected]> wrote:
> +1.
>
> Thanks for bringing this up, Justin. Does the developer manual address
> this matter?
>
I am not sure, i don't believe so. Perhaps something under here:
http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer
On 18/09/12 15:02, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Agreed here too. I normally go to jira, open the issue, do "view xml"
> and copy the
> title field, which contains both jira number and title of the jira
Thanks. A nice trick that avoids having to cut and paste multiple selection.
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
So
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <
[email protected]> wrote:
> +1.
>
Agreed here too. I normally go to jira, open the issue, do "view xml" and
copy the
title field, which contains both jira number and title of the jira
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Our support, Your Success!
+1.
Thanks for bringing this up, Justin. Does the developer manual address
this matter?
I find commit messages with only the Jira key to be a lot less helpful
than they could be. Developers, please think of another developer
looking at a long log listing. Or a maintainer considering your pull
Hi folks,
I have been noticing a few commit messages go by with no comment except for
the jira number they are related. While this is efficient (less typing) it
is also cumbersome for someone reviewing, or analyzing history to have to
go back to jira to figure out what the context. At least a sent
