On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:18 AM, David Winslow wrote:
> The 2.7-M3 release of GeoTools does not contain the gt-directory jar (I
> checked in the -bin.zip archive as well as on the OSGeo Maven repository.)
> Is this intentional? Should I refer to this module by a different name now?
It is intentio
It should of been published I guess; normally during release I do a deploy with
-Dall on; Justin did the last release perhaps he takes different steps.
You could check out the tag and deploy the unsupported modules if you wish.
Currently we do not have a road map so I cannot advice waiting for t
Ah, I didn't bother checking if it was unsupported. I just assumed it
should be available since the 2.7-M2 version was available on the Maven repo
(and I'm just using that for now, no big deal.)
Would it be reasonable to get this added to the repository, or should I just
wait for the next release
I don't think that is a supported module? Only the supported modules are
included in the release archives. I do try and publish everything out to maven
however.
Reasoning: The GeoTools PMC is only taking responsibility for publishing code
that has been reviewed and meets our project policies an
The 2.7-M3 release of GeoTools does not contain the gt-directory jar (I
checked in the -bin.zip archive as well as on the OSGeo Maven repository.)
Is this intentional? Should I refer to this module by a different name now?
--
David Winslow
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
---
