Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-imagemosaic schema up to date?

2016-07-25 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Devon Tucker wrote: > Hi Daniele, > > I would start with question #2. Does anyone actually use the XSD? > I have no idea on this. We have only used it to automatically create the java classes the first time. I don't think anyone else used it. > That makes sense

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-imagemosaic schema up to date?

2016-07-22 Thread Devon Tucker
Hi Daniele, That makes sense. I guess that raises the question of what to do with the XSD now. Should it go away, or should we attempt to update it to match the current generated objects? Does anyone actually use the XSD? On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Daniele Romagnoli < daniele.romagn...@geo-

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-imagemosaic schema up to date?

2016-07-21 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Devon, If my memory serves me right, the schema has been used as starting point to make the creation of the classes easier with XJC but some manual tweaks have been performed afterwards on the generated classes. Does it helps? Cheers, Daniele On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Devon Tucker

[Geotools-devel] gt-imagemosaic schema up to date?

2016-07-20 Thread Devon Tucker
Hi all, Quick question that maybe someone can answer: in gt-imagemosaic there is an indexer.xsd schema that seems to define the Indexer object, plus classes that appear to have been generated from this schema. It's not clear though how these objects were generated. If I use XJC by default I get ob