Re: [Geotools-devel] org.geotools.data.jdbc revisiting

2006-08-17 Thread Jody Garnett
TECTED] [mailto:geotools-devel- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jody Garnett >> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 6:58 PM >> To: David Adler >> Cc: 'Jesse Eichar'; Vitali Diatchkov; geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] org.g

Re: [Geotools-devel] org.geotools.data.jdbc revisiting

2006-08-17 Thread Vitali Diatchkov
n Behalf Of Jody Garnett > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 6:58 PM > To: David Adler > Cc: 'Jesse Eichar'; Vitali Diatchkov; geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] org.geotools.data.jdbc revisiting > > My rough idea was to choose betwe

Re: [Geotools-devel] org.geotools.data.jdbc revisiting

2006-08-17 Thread Jody Garnett
ad >> AttributeIO >> >> 4) Look into ResultSet-based modification execution and try for Oracle. >> >> Any advises? >> >> Vitali. >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:geotools-devel- >>

Re: [Geotools-devel] org.geotools.data.jdbc revisiting

2006-08-17 Thread David Adler
>Vitali. > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:geotools-devel- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jody Garnett > > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:12 PM > > To: Vitali Diatchkov > > Cc: Jesse Eichar; geotools-devel@lists.sourcef

Re: [Geotools-devel] org.geotools.data.jdbc revisiting

2006-08-17 Thread Jody Garnett
> Vitali. > > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:geotools-devel- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jody Garnett >> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:12 PM >> To: Vitali Diatchkov >> Cc: Jesse Eichar; geotools-devel@lists.

Re: [Geotools-devel] org.geotools.data.jdbc revisiting

2006-08-17 Thread Vitali Diatchkov
itali. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:geotools-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jody Garnett > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:12 PM > To: Vitali Diatchkov > Cc: Jesse Eichar; geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Geotools-dev

Re: [Geotools-devel] org.geotools.data.jdbc revisiting

2006-08-17 Thread Justin Deoliveira
I have to say, JDBCDataStore has become quite the beast. And its pretty hard to maintain I must say. Jody Garnett wrote: > I had a conversation with Jesse last week about this very topic :-) With > several points in common with your proposal, lets follow this up > when he comes back from holiday.

Re: [Geotools-devel] org.geotools.data.jdbc revisiting

2006-08-17 Thread Jody Garnett
I had a conversation with Jesse last week about this very topic :-) With several points in common with your proposal, lets follow this up when he comes back from holiday. I do apologize for the state of JDBC DataStore, it was never my intention to have huge superclasses that were so difficult to

[Geotools-devel] org.geotools.data.jdbc revisiting

2006-08-17 Thread Vitali Diatchkov
Hello! I would like to share some ideas that I have already implemented on the top of GT 2.2.x. It concerns JDBC stuff and OracleDataStore as a framework for testing of new architecture. JDBCDataStore is about reading and writing features from/to database. The main problem having been a force to