Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto:
> So my understanding of the last sentence is that applying axis flip on
> "urn:ogc..." is incorrect, and the CITE tests may need to be fixed in this
> regards - if "urn:ogc..." is widely interpreted in the flipped sense, we may
> need to adapt to this reality. Andr
Rob Atkinson wrote:
ahh - this is serius issue in the specifications front...
I think the behaviour is correct.
The OGC specifies that the urn: referenced coordinate systems should
always be interpreted as Lon/lat order,
oops - i meant lat/lon - getting tripped up myself...
in conformance t
Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
> The problem that I am running into is that in GeoServer we use the hint
> the to switch the axis of 4326. However when a WFS request comes in with
> the srsName of:
>
> "urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:6.11.2:4326"
>
> The hint does not seem to apply and the coordinate system
ahh - this is serius issue in the specifications front...
I think the behaviour is correct.
The OGC specifies that the urn: referenced coordinate systems should
always be interpreted as Lon/lat order, in conformance to the EPSG
"definition" - though they dont also specify that it should be in
Hi Martin,
I am not sure but I think Andrea may have brought this issue up with you
before. But he is on vacation at the moment so I will ask you.
The problem that I am running into is that in GeoServer we use the hint
the to switch the axis of 4326. However when a WFS request comes in with
the s
