Re: [Geotools-devel] testing and java 6 and testing on an ibm jdk

2009-02-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Christian Müller a écrit : > I never succeeded running a "mvn clean install" on an IBM sdk. Can anybody > notify me if we succeed with sun java 6. Afterwards I will try it with the > ibm sdk (necessairy for all users running geotools/geoserver in Websphere or > using geotools on AIX, Linux/ppc o

Re: [Geotools-devel] testing and java 6

2009-02-09 Thread Martin Desruisseaux
Maybe we could revert and re-enable the tests? Actually I'm neutral on this issue, but if I'm understanding right, the tests were disabled for Javadoc generation? If so, the path of less resistance may be to suffer the javadoc problems for now and get them solved (as far as referencing is concer

Re: [Geotools-devel] testing and java 6 and testing on an ibm jdk

2009-02-09 Thread Christian Müller
I never succeeded running a "mvn clean install" on an IBM sdk. Can anybody notify me if we succeed with sun java 6. Afterwards I will try it with the ibm sdk (necessairy for all users running geotools/geoserver in Websphere or using geotools on AIX, Linux/ppc or Linux/zOs) Adrian Custer wri

Re: [Geotools-devel] testing and java 6

2009-02-09 Thread Adrian Custer
I've already spent way too much time on this today so I don't want to get into a long discussion as well. Right now, to build on Java6, you skip all the tests with -DskipTests. I disabled the tests in two modules, modules which are 'stable' (i.e. no one should be modifying those modules) and are s

Re: [Geotools-devel] testing and java 6

2009-02-09 Thread Andrea Aime
Adrian Custer ha scritto: > As per the mail ten seconds later, > > tests die in java6, required for java6 > code should not be being modified so tests should not break anew > > revert as you will. Afaik there is a way to make test disabling trigger only on java6, which is, using a profile

Re: [Geotools-devel] testing and java 6

2009-02-09 Thread Adrian Custer
I was trying to say: tests die in java 6, required for javadoc while getting geotools building for java 6 seems like a no brainer anyhow, fixing referencing tests for java 6 seems like a waste of time given the pending transition to the cleaned version of the base metadata/referencing code.

Re: [Geotools-devel] testing and java 6

2009-02-09 Thread Jody Garnett
Thinking; can we disable these test using a Java 6 profile? On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Adrian Custer wrote: > As per the mail ten seconds later, > > tests die in java6, required for java6 > code should not be being modified so tests should not break anew > > revert as you will. > > --adr

Re: [Geotools-devel] testing and java 6

2009-02-09 Thread Adrian Custer
As per the mail ten seconds later, tests die in java6, required for java6 code should not be being modified so tests should not break anew revert as you will. --adrian On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 22:03 +1100, Jody Garnett wrote: > Hi Adrian; > > > I watched your commit go by: > - (9:59:03 P

[Geotools-devel] testing and java 6

2009-02-09 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Adrian; I watched your commit go by: - (9:59:03 PM) CIA-21: acuster * r*32439* /trunk/modules/ (library/referencing/pom.xml plugin/epsg-hsql/pom.xml): Build fixes: pull referencing and epsg-hsql from testing Something about removing epsh-hsql from testing; we actually like tests here as it is t