Re: [Geotools-devel] Erroneous handling of Literals in ExpressionParser

2005-11-10 Thread jgarnett
I was going to say lets just fix the problem ... treat literals as they are String literals. We can certerntly provide convience methods toInt toDouble etc... so we don't perform caching multiple times. I want to smack the filter code at somepoint (to allow breathing room for Filter 1.1), if

Re: Re: Re:[Geotools-devel] Erroneous handling of Literals in ExpressionParser

2005-11-10 Thread juergen . link
> Yes, the filter-and-literal stuff was poorly designed. well, I didn't want to go to such lengths - but it's definitely a flaw. > > Basically, what needs to happen is the actual filter class should just > store the literals as strings, and the filter evaluation code should do > any necessary conv

Re: Re:[Geotools-devel] Erroneous handling of Literals in ExpressionParser

2005-11-08 Thread dblasby
Jürgen, Yes, the filter-and-literal stuff was poorly designed. I've put a bunch of patches in to minimize the damage and considered hiring a dutch boy to stick his finger in the cracks. Basically, what needs to happen is the actual filter class should just store the literals as strings, and the

Re: Re:[Geotools-devel] Erroneous handling of Literals in ExpressionParser

2005-10-28 Thread Jürgen Link
Chris, thanks for your quick reply. I'm using a geotools version checked out from svn on October 9th. I will check in the next few days whether there are any fixes done recently. Maybe Dave can give a hint? Is there yet a timeline for the redesign? Any volunteers yet? Though we can use some di

Re: [Geotools-devel] Erroneous handling of Literals in ExpressionParser

2005-10-27 Thread Chris Holmes
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Our intention is to develop a web application that investigates and > expands (if necessary) an OGC filter attached to a request. > > We assume to use the following filter: > http://www.opengis.net/gml";> > > myValue > 10 >