On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 8:25 AM, wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> Thank you for your response. I will try to add more explanatory notes to the
> proposal when time permits. I considered making several smaller proposals but
> decided against it as I didn't think the task lent itself to being broken up;
ail.com] On Behalf Of Andrea
Aime
Sent: Sunday, 10 June 2012 5:11 PM
To: Caradoc-Davies, Ben (CESRE, Kensington)
Cc: geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Brown, Adam (CESRE, Kensington)
Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] API Change Proposal: ComplexFeature Parsing &
Building Support
Hi all,
have been lo
Hi all,
have been looking at the proposal, I have to say I'm finding it difficult
to read as it crams into a single proposal a number of changes that
can be related togheter only under the assumption that one is
making a new wfs data store, and as such they do require some
familiarity with how the
> Also, Adam has created some lovely before-and-after UML diagrams in support
> of this proposal:
> https://www.seegrid.csiro.au/wiki/ASRDC/ChangedTypeHierarchies
>
> Do we as a matter of policy require this external content to be copied
> to Codehaus Confluence, or is it OK to leave it on the s
*Sent:* Thursday, 7 June 2012 6:16 AM
> *To:* Caradoc-Davies, Ben (CESRE, Kensington)
> *Cc:* geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Brown, Adam (CESRE,
> Kensington)
> *Subject:* Re: [Geotools-devel] API Change Proposal: ComplexFeature
> Parsing & Building Support
>
> ** *
o:jdeol...@opengeo.org]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2012 6:16 AM
> To: Caradoc-Davies, Ben (CESRE, Kensington)
> Cc: geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> (mailto:geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net); Brown, Adam (CESRE, Kensington)
> Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] API Change Proposal:
lists.sourceforge.net; Brown, Adam (CESRE, Kensington)
Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] API Change Proposal: ComplexFeature Parsing &
Building Support
QUickly looked over the proposal and have a few thoughts.
* ComplexFeatureBuilder.append() -> is there no way to keep the method "add()&qu
QUickly looked over the proposal and have a few thoughts.
* ComplexFeatureBuilder.append() -> is there no way to keep the method
"add()" like in simple feature builder?
* I don't see how the DataAccessFactory / DataStoreFactory apis are
changing?
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
