Re: [Geotools-devel] Git Migration another step in the right direction

2012-05-25 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Oh and yes I am a +1 on switching over to git. Things i think we want/need before a full switch. * a quick primer for people with sample commands for common tasks * a list of git does and donts, ie don't rebase on a public branch, etc... * line endings figured out re Bens comment * a way to get gi

Re: [Geotools-devel] Git Migration another step in the right direction

2012-05-25 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Funny you bring this up Ben. We use git for some internal projects and have developers on windows that recently ran into this issue and it was a real pita. Although it was fine up until a developer has to actually be able to commit just one file with crlf endings, a windows .cmd file that seemed to

Re: [Geotools-devel] Git Migration another step in the right direction

2012-05-24 Thread Michael Bedward
On 25 May 2012 13:56, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Are there any other subversion properties whose absence will be missed > when we migrate to git? > We lose the svn source and URL keywords. The source keyword is used by the GeoTools javadoc plugin to add the module information at the top of the j

Re: [Geotools-devel] Git Migration another step in the right direction

2012-05-24 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 25/05/12 10:17, Jody Garnett wrote: > I think most of our core team is happy with git these days; how about we > schedule the migration after GeoTools 8.0 is released? +1. At this point I must admit to being somewhat of a git n00b. While I have been using git for local branches, almost all o