On 7/7/10 1:31 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Can someone translate MVCC?
>
> I note that we faced the same issue with arcsde (not being
> threadsafe) and made a queue of commands with a single worker thread
> allowed access to the connection.
Note though that since a little before last year's FOSS4G WM
Multi version concurrency control. For instance with H2 if you don't
have MVCC you can only create a connection with a single thread.
On 10-07-07 10:31 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Can someone translate MVCC?
>
> I note that we faced the same issue with arcsde (not being threadsafe) and
> made a qu
Thank you Justin, this is very helpful.
On 07/07/2010 11:59 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> It really depends. I would say no there is no inherent assumption in
> geotools itself about how a backend will handle multiple concurrent
> connections.
>
> However practically anyone that intends to use
Can someone translate MVCC?
I note that we faced the same issue with arcsde (not being threadsafe) and made
a queue of commands with a single worker thread allowed access to the
connection.
Jody
On 08/07/2010, at 1:59 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> It really depends. I would say no there is n
It really depends. I would say no there is no inherent assumption in
geotools itself about how a backend will handle multiple concurrent
connections.
However practically anyone that intends to use GeoServer in a server app
like GeoServer (or a multi threaded client app for that matter) is
esse
