Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-26 Thread andrea antonello
[...] >> Hi Simone; I understand we are all stressed for time. I don't think we mind >> building for the mac - I simply just have not had a chance to try yet. I >> understand there are now some build instructions. > > Andrea (Antonello) and Daniele should have done some work in this > direction,

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-24 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Jody, please read below... --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Founder - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob:+39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solut

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-20 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Simone; I understand we are all stressed for time. I don't think we mind building for the mac - I simply just have not had a chance to try yet. I understand there are now some build instructions. Right now I need to get a working jre for linux - and we can do planning later. This is firefigh

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-20 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Andrea, quick note, we have hardware and software for windows 64 bits, we just don't have had time yet to start playing with it. About mac, we have hardware and software for it (and expertise as well :-) ) but we have NO interest atm to to the builds on that platform. About helping, I think t

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread Jody Garnett
I have confirmed that ECW and SID files work on win32 (after making a release of uDig based on 2.6-SNAPSHOT). So if we can verify on linux we should be back in the game. Jody On 18/11/2009, at 9:35 AM, Daniele Romagnoli wrote: > Hi all, > let me briefly summarize some info :) > > The only imp

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Andrea, I'm out of my usual office today. Anyway, I have just downloaded the 2.6.x branch, downloaded the 1.0.4 linux64 bit native libs from the imageio-ext site, deployed the native libs on a folder, added that folder to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH and run mvn test on the geotools imageio-ext-gdal plug

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread andrea antonello
Daniele, thanks for the information. I also should not be doing these tests now, so I am probably missing something. I will definitely review the whole thing with more chalm and let you know the outcome. Good to know what to search for. Thanks, Andrea On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Daniele Ro

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread andrea antonello
Hi Daniele, > this usually happen when the jar containing the JNI calls > (imageio-ext-gdalbindings) and the native libs (gdaljni.dll or similar so) > aren't aligned to the same version. As an instance, this may happen when in > your machineĀ  the old native libs (the one made for 1.0.3 and belove)

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Andrea, this usually happen when the jar containing the JNI calls (imageio-ext-gdalbindings) and the native libs (gdaljni.dll or similar so) aren't aligned to the same version. As an instance, this may happen when in your machine the old native libs (the one made for 1.0.3 and belove) are somew

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread andrea antonello
Thanks for the info Daniele, I just tried the new libs and in uDig I get: !MESSAGE org.gdal.gdal.gdalJNI.Dataset_ReadRaster_Direct__SWIG_2(JLorg/gdal/gdal/Dataset;III[B)I !STACK 0 java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: org.gdal.gdal.gdalJNI.Dataset_ReadRaster_Direct__SWIG_2(JLorg/gdal/gdal/Datas

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Ops. a Typo occurred in my previous message: --- Hence you dont need to rebuild the binaries; you can reuse the 1.0.5 ones. --- should be: --- Hence you dont need to rebuild the binaries; you can reuse the *1.0.4* ones. --- Sorry about this. Regards On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Daniele Rom

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi all, let me briefly summarize some info :) The only important differences between 1.0.4 and 1.0.5 are an improvement of the direct kakadu plugin (as well as some minor changes on the utilities jar adding a method required by the kakadu plugin). Anyway, it is worth to point out that no differenc

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread Jody Garnett
Andrea perhaps we can ask the imageio-ext installer to have an option to install into the JRE? Right now I trick it by setting JAVA_HOME to my JRE and then running the installer. Hopefully you could do this in order to get a working JRE for imageio-ext 1.0.5 and thus be able to meet your deadli

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread Jody Garnett
So 2.6-SNAPSHOT was updated to use 1.0.5 on us? What is this doing happening on the stable release :-( Jody On 18/11/2009, at 8:16 AM, andrea antonello wrote: >> Considering I just built a JRE for imageio-ext 1.0.4 and have not managed to >> make a release on that yet I am not in a position to

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread andrea antonello
> Considering I just built a JRE for imageio-ext 1.0.4 and have not managed to > make a release on that yet I am not in a position to upgrade uDig (or 2.6.x) > at this time. In fact I am right now going through this since I am packaging JGrass for a course with all last fixes. Apparently on linu

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread Jody Garnett
Considering I just built a JRE for imageio-ext 1.0.4 and have not managed to make a release on that yet I am not in a position to upgrade uDig (or 2.6.x) at this time. Jody On 18/11/2009, at 7:09 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> Sounds interesting (I was too busy to review

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-18 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Sounds interesting (I was too busy to review docs yet but glad you are > moving!) does the change to imageio-ext change much? Do I need to make > a JRE+GDAL again? Give me some more detail please. I think the main issue Jody and others are facing is that they need to red

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-17 Thread Jody Garnett
Sounds interesting (I was too busy to review docs yet but glad you are moving!) does the change to imageio-ext change much? Do I need to make a JRE+GDAL again? Give me some more detail please. Jody On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Daniele Romagnoli wrote: > Hi all, > I have updated the JP2K page

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-17 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi all, I have updated the JP2K page: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/JP2K+plugin I'm now updating Geotools to depends on imageio-ext 1.0.5. Then I will move the jp2k plugin to supported land. Regards, Daniele On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > +1 from me. > >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-16 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
+1 from me. On 16/11/09 20:02, Daniele Romagnoli wrote: > Hi list, > We would like to move the geotools JP2KAK plugin from unsupported to > supported land: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/JP2K+Kakadu+Plugin > > As you may notice from the wiki page: > - Added the review.apt, > - Improved

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-16 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Simone, I have added some additional info. Regards, Daniele On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Ciao Daniele, > before giving you my +1 I would add a bit more documentation for this > plugin. > > Simone. > -

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-16 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Daniele, before giving you my +1 I would add a bit more documentation for this plugin. Simone. --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Founder - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fa

Re: [Geotools-devel] Moving the JP2KAK plugin on supported status

2009-11-16 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi again list, I have setup a wiki page for the User documentation as required by the developers guide: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/JP2K+plugin I have also deployed the imageio-ext 1.0.5 release on the OSGEO maven repo. Can I have a +1 to move the module on supported land? (I already