+0. No objection.
On 25/10/16 20:44, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Cough cough... anyone? :-)
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Andrea Aime
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm writing this mail to propose the move of the geopackge module to
>> supported land.
>> The proposal is backed by this
Sorry i was away from internet last week. +1
I am not familiar with the codebase, but glad to see another module added
to the mix. This is the same module shipped by boundless to our customers
giving a start for "used in anger".
--
Jody Garnett
On 20 October 2016 at 03:51, Andrea Aime
wrote:
I thought I +1'd this but it was still in draft :-)
Ian
On 26 October 2016 at 09:11, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> And my +1 too, of course. I'm rather surprised to see so little interest
> in geopackage...
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Simone Giannecchini <
> simone.giannecch
And my +1 too, of course. I'm rather surprised to see so little interest in
geopackage...
Cheers
Andrea
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Well, if nobody else is interested I'll give my +1.
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Simone Giannecchi
Well, if nobody else is interested I'll give my +1.
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
@simogeo
Founder/Director
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054 Massaros
Cough cough... anyone? :-)
Cheers
Andrea
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm writing this mail to propose the move of the geopackge module to
> supported land.
> The proposal is backed by this pull request, adding the final touches to
> the module:
> https://github.
