Ooooh a new git toy! Thanks David. Looks very useful.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:10 AM, David Winslow wrote:
> I don't do much GeoTools development, but on the topic of "safety nets" in
> Git:
> http://gitready.com/intermediate/2009/02/09/reflog-your-safety-net.html
>
> I hope it's of use whether
I don't do much GeoTools development, but on the topic of "safety nets" in
Git: http://gitready.com/intermediate/2009/02/09/reflog-your-safety-net.html
I hope it's of use whether or not GeoTools "officially" moves over.
--
David Winslow
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:07
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Mark Prins wrote:
> 2011/11/11 Andrea Aime :
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:53 AM, wrote:
>
> > I also hear git on windows is still problematic to use (yeah, almost
> nobody
> > left doing development on windows
> > around here, yet the user base still uses it a l
2011/11/11 Andrea Aime :
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:53 AM, wrote:
> I also hear git on windows is still problematic to use (yeah, almost nobody
> left doing development on windows
> around here, yet the user base still uses it a lot)
actually I find that the windows problems are not so much wit
Yeah, I think I am -0 as well. While I am open to the idea of switching
fully to git I do like something about that fact that we have the
subversion repository as the "canonical" representation. I have definitely
shot myself in the foot with branches and rebasing, etc...in git... having
the extra l
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> We had this discussion already on gs-devel six months ago:
>
> http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Community-modules-and-the-whole-development-process-td6360374.html
> I also hear git on windows is still problematic to use (yeah, almost
> no
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:53 AM, wrote:
>
>> A "silent" question here.
>>
>> Justin gave me a crash course in git and it seems that git is superior to
>> svn. I really start liking it.
>>
>> On the other side, working with git and an svn repo
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:53 AM, wrote:
> A "silent" question here.
>
> Justin gave me a crash course in git and it seems that git is superior to
> svn. I really start liking it.
>
> On the other side, working with git and an svn repository seems to be
> complicated.
>
> With geotools 8 and geos
A "silent" question here.
Justin gave me a crash course in git and it seems that git is superior
to svn. I really start liking it.
On the other side, working with git and an svn repository seems to be
complicated.
With geotools 8 and geoserver 2.2 we switch to SDK6, why not switching
to a
I am actually just in the process of switching to this setup as well, one
repo, rather than multiple per branch. The reason being to be able to use
cherry picking. I find the git svn clone very tricky as well. It seems that
it can easily error out depending on what revision you a referencing ...
th
Ah "git-svn" != "git+svn" tricky.
--
Jody Garnett
On Thursday, 10 November 2011 at 10:09 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> On 10 November 2011 22:53, Jody Garnett (mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > That is very odd? it is not like there is any .svn files around for it to
> > recognise? H
On 10 November 2011 22:53, Jody Garnett wrote:
> That is very odd? it is not like there is any .svn files around for it to
> recognise? How does it even know the code is under version control?
GOTO first message in this thread :)
Michael
-
That is very odd? it is not like there is any .svn files around for it to
recognise? How does it even know the code is under version control?
--
Jody Garnett
On Thursday, 10 November 2011 at 9:00 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> The git+svn approach seems too much for NetBeans. It recognizes the
The git+svn approach seems too much for NetBeans. It recognizes the
project as a subversion checkout but is blind to the git repo within
it.
Michael
--
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.n
Thanks Jody - I found your notes and some that Ben had put up as well.
Andrea - a tarball would be great. Being much more lazy than you, I
looked to see if anyone had already done this before I tried using git
svn clone.
I understood that any passwords, user names etc set with git config
are stor
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Michael Bedward
wrote:
> Dear Git users,
>
> I have finally started using Git, some years after most others here. I
> must say that I like it, or at least most of it, and can see how the
> ease of working with branches is ideal when experimenting with new
> code in
Well I will be on IRC if you need a hand.
I have written up my notes on how to do stuff here:
- http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/ADMIN/Git+Notes
--
Jody Garnett
On Thursday, 10 November 2011 at 4:16 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
> Thanks Jody, that's interesting.
>
> I've got th
Thanks Jody, that's interesting.
I've got the "git+svn" structure set up and will let you know how it
goes with the next batch of gt-swing hacking. I suspect I'll be doing
a fair bit of squash-merging of my git micro-commits when preparing
svn commits.
Michael
On 10 November 2011 16:58, Jody Gar
I am kind of with Justin in that I have two separate git-svn clones. One for
trunk and another for 2.7.x.
Setting up git-svn to work with the svn branches was too difficult for
geotools; not because of the large projects; but because we have hand edited
our svn repository over time and there a
19 matches
Mail list logo
