Well I would say that since there are no people currently using the
module (that I know of), and no module maintainer around that you should
be able to commit to it directly.
Emily Gouge wrote:
> I'm not sure how "back to life" I'll be able to bring it, but at least I
> can submit updates to ma
I'm not sure how "back to life" I'll be able to bring it, but at least I
can submit updates to make it buildable and hopefully get the test cases
running again.
What's the best way for me to submit changes? Should I create bug
reports and patches or see if I can commit to it directly?
Thanks.
Hi Emily,
I would say it is fair game. Like Michael said it was a summer of code
project so if you want to bring it back to life please do :).
-Justin
Emily Gouge wrote:
> I'm looking into using the unsupported gt-caching module for client side
> caching of features. I'm wondering the status
It doesn't build for me (at least the version on trunk) and it doesn't
look like anyone has touched it since the author's summer of code work
last year.
Michael
2008/12/17 Emily Gouge :
> I'm looking into using the unsupported gt-caching module for client side
> caching of features. I'm wonderin
