I'll have a go at making the changes to the SQLServer this week, if I can
finish shaving the QGis Yaks.
Ian
On Mon Dec 08 2014 at 3:49:34 PM Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> I am for the merge as well.
>
> I am more concerned by the explosion of modules than an
I am for the merge as well.
I am more concerned by the explosion of modules than anything else (i.e
maintenance costs).
Regards,
Simone Giannecchini
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/NWWaa2
for more information.
Please, notice that GeoSolutions will be clos
Fwiw I would also vote for a single module as long as the JTDS addition
isn't "disruptive" in any way which, and it sounds like it is not.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Ian Turton wrote:
> I started to do it that way then I worried that the changes might be more
> extensive and broke it out. O
I started to do it that way then I worried that the changes might be more
extensive and broke it out. Once I finished it became apparent they didn't
make that much difference.
So merging back into one project might be best
Ian
On Mon Dec 08 2014 at 8:45:30 AM Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> Ian's p
