Cool, I will cut the 8.x branch today and do the release. As described
recently there are still going to be some kinks to work out and in the
interest of not putting Victor through any more pain I will generate out
the artifacts myself.
For now i am going to assume the release model I described a
We're too close!
On 01/07/12 12:37, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Stay on target stay on target :-)
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Software Engineer
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Research Centre
--
> Sorry... why does it make a difference whether we release from master or an
> 8.x branch?
>
>
>
It does not make a difference; I was just hoping to make sure it worked
(including release scripts) before taking branches off of master.
> Unfortunately there will still be a few kinks to work
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Stay on target stay on target :-)
>
> The "plan" outlined on the proposal page is to make a release from github
> to show we made it. After that point I would be happy to branch (cause we
> would know what we are branching from is solid and r
Stay on target stay on target :-)
The "plan" outlined on the proposal page is to make a release from github to
show we made it. After that point I would be happy to branch (cause we would
know what we are branching from is solid and releasable).
I did volunteer on that page to make an RC3 (or
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the git changeover winding down what do people think about a timeline
> for cutting the 8.x branch and making it the stable branch?
>
> For us geoserver folks we would like to follow suite as soon as possible,
> however
