On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Thoughts?
>>
>
> I went ahead and did some more refactoring to make vector and raster
> process classes extensible. Its now possible to register implementations of
> each interface (VectorProcess, and RasterProcess) and have them loaded b
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Andrea Aime > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Justin Deoliveira > > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I have completed a first cut of a process reorganization as discussed a
>>> week or so
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Justin Deoliveira
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I have completed a first cut of a process reorganization as discussed a
>> week or so ago. It can be found in this pull request.
>>
>> https://github.com/geoto
On 23 August 2012 20:30, Andrea Aime wrote:
> it would be nice to have an SPI for that too, maybe have the factory lookup in
> META-INF/services and look up the class names, but not going through the
> official SPI where you actually get a single instance of the class, just do
> something
> that
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have completed a first cut of a process reorganization as discussed a
> week or so ago. It can be found in this pull request.
>
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/14
>
> We had agreed that four categories made
