Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: change from webdav to nexus

Master is now migrated, there is a pull request to update the docs also. This change should be back ported to active branches (although a redirect is possible our experience last time showed that maven was unable to process redirects). Note users c

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: change from webdav to nexus

Sounds good, I have updated the wiki page based on this thread. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 16:39, Torben Barsballe wrote: > > 1) I will note that repo.boundlessgeo.com was set up to allow for > separat

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: change from webdav to nexus

1) I will note that repo.boundlessgeo.com was set up to allow for separate repos, we just chose not to use that option in GeoServer. I assume that was just done for convenience, and not for any particular reason... 2) I'm looking at the repo updates in GeoTools, and it turns out GeoTools does not

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: change from webdav to nexus

Good thinking, updated the repository accordingly. Worth discussing: 1) The approach has a clear distinction between "snapshot" and "release" repository (previously repo.boundlessgeo.com was used for both snapshots and releases) ... I think this approach will build faster 2) The release repositor

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: change from webdav to nexus

One comment on the proposal itself - at least during the migration, we should avoid using the same repository id for the nexus repo as for the webdav repo ("osgeo") to make configuration credential management easier (I've been using "nexus" as the id of the nexus repo so far). If we want to change

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: change from webdav to nexus

With the build going out this week we have an opportunity to try out the repository management changes. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 12:16, Jody Garnett wrote: > Catching up on this activity. > > * Tom (and Torben) were able to transfer the vast majority of the > repo.boundlessgeo.com