Ascii raster tests involving gzipped images disabled because of extreme slowness
Key: GEOT-1146
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1146
Project: GeoTools
Scale computation does not conform to OGC standard
--
Key: GEOT-1147
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1147
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core render
Affec
Hi all,
I've committed the changes to the scale computation, now the default
for 2.3.x and trunk is the OGC way to compute a scale. The older
can still be chosen passing the scaleComputationMethod hint.
It's quite nice I'd add, to have mapbuilder scale in line with
geoserver one.
On projected maps
Hi Rueben :-D
I am starting to round up "good" examples and tutorials from our wiki -
if you say this is "up to date" can I move it over to the "user guide"
space?
Cheers,
Jody
> Hello Olaf,
>
> I have not been very involved in the geotools project over the last few
> years, but I am the author
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
Le mardi 30 janvier 2007 à 13:32 -0800, Jody Garnett a écrit :
Java EE has been out since May and I wonder how GeoServer fairs in that
environment. Is everything okay, or are we going to take the more
realistic step and check back when J2EE has been adopted by more
Andrea can I have a "upgrade to 2.3" instruction for this please" :-)
We did not go through a geotools proposal on this one (it is an API
change is it not?); is their a Jira that will show up in the
change notes at least?
Jody
> Hi all,
> I've committed the changes to the scale computation, now
I must confess the unsupported/geometry module is giving me some panic
on this front. I like the work I see their and would not like to ask
them to "roll back" to Java 1.4. Especially since they have met the
letter of developers guide ...
Sigh,
Jody
>
>
> Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
>> Le mardi
Which would be 2.4 or 2.5? It'd be good to get the 2.4 release at least
without need 1.5.
We also might consider calling it GeoTools 3.0 if we go 1.5.
Jody Garnett wrote:
I must confess the unsupported/geometry module is giving me some panic
on this front. I like the work I see their and woul
How extensive is the use of the new language features? If its just use
of generics can we give them a script similar to the geoapi one? Martin
cleaned it up so that most of the generics are caught by a single
regular expressions.
We could come half the way and allow people to start using 1.5, h
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> How extensive is the use of the new language features? If its just use
> of generics can we give them a script similar to the geoapi one?
> Martin cleaned it up so that most of the generics are caught by a
> single regular expressions.
looks to be generics and one Enum
Hi Chris:
> Which would be 2.4 or 2.5? It'd be good to get the 2.4 release at
> least without need 1.5.
I agree on the 2.4 thing ... GeoTools 2.4 looks like it is going to be
one of our best (now that filter is tested, and with the clean up to
prep for ISO Feature). Thinking if we can delay sup
In hunting through a build problem (I was not up to date) I noticed the
following ...
> 1-Feb-2007 11:55:46 AM org.geotools.renderer.lite.StreamingRenderer
> computeScale
> WARNING: null
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> at
> org.geotools.renderer.lite.RendererUtilities.calculateScale(R
Move implementations to coverage and render modules
---
Key: GEOT-1148
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1148
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core covera
Le jeudi 01 février 2007 à 12:01 -0800, Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
> How extensive is the use of the new language features? If its just use
> of generics can we give them a script similar to the geoapi one? Martin
> cleaned it up so that most of the generics are caught by a single
> regular exp
Okay - I think I best do the responsible thing at make a proposal for this.
Actually Martin I am trying out the "proposal process"; do you think you
could grab the wiki page
template and give it a go? I am sure this proposal is very shy on tasks
(update developers guide, modify pom.xml files etc
Hi again:
> I was going to start my stint as a GeoTools developer by reading the
> Developer Guide. However, the link to the developer found on the left
> side of the following page is broken:
>
> http://geotools.codehaus.org/Develop
>
It looks like these links are fixed now ... thanks for p
Hi Jody,
I just looked over the document and it is up to date with the current
geotools referencing code (using geoapi interfaces). There are some
incomplete sections (such as Conventions and Internationalization), but
the tutorial should point people to the right direction to get started
when imp
17 matches
Mail list logo
