Hi,
a quick mail that I'm sending to the ml in place of Jody
since he's having mail troubles.
He's doing some teaching and the students have asked for
a 3rd dimension be outputted in gml when 3d data is available
in the datastore.
The trouble being that now the postgis datastore casts everything
to
CoordainteWriter unable to Generate 3D
--
Key: GEOT-1716
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1716
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: core xml, data postgis
Affects Ve
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> If you revise the draft document on metadata that I sent you a while
> ago, you would see that we left space for nodata, offset and scale
> values for each band.
Yes I remember and we agree on that. But based on previous emails and on a look
to TransformCategory in
I feel that I should remind a point of object oriented programming:
There is many way to see subclassing. The vision adopted by ISO specification
(which is also the vision that I suggest to adopt) is in the sense of
"specialization", not necessarly "having more attributes". Thinks verb "to be",
I am trying to set up a student with the ability to edit the wiki; and
so far even adding him to xircles is not work. Does anyone have a clue
on this one... I will raise a Haus chore.
Jody
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Hi Andrea,
already fixed this, you can try it out on your windows box.
The problem was testParseFeature were copying a GetFeature response test file
to a temp file but overriding its schema location to a temp file, but using
File.getAbsolutePath() which lead to the usual file separator platform
There is a useful method in DataUtilities for converting URLs to
files. Or maybe files to URLs but I'd recommend using that so all our
hacks are consistent through out Geotools.
Jesse
Le 25-Feb-08 à 3:32 AM, Gabriel Roldán a écrit :
> Hi Andrea,
>
> already fixed this, you can try it out on
Hey gabriel,
Any chance you've forgotten to commit the .wkt files referenced in
GeometryBuilderTest.java? I'm trying to track them down, but can't seem
to find them in geotools anywhere.
Am I looking in the wrong spot?
thanks much!
--saul
--
On Monday 25 February 2008 08:47:54 pm Saul Farber wrote:
> Hey gabriel,
>
> Any chance you've forgotten to commit the .wkt files referenced in
> GeometryBuilderTest.java?
worse than that! accidentally removed them when I got rid of the rest of test
resources (which is a good thing).
> I'm tryin
Hi everyone,
we're hoping to start the release process for GeoServer 1.6.1 tomorrow
and release the new version on Wednesday.
For this to happen we need to cut the 2.4.x branch. Please let me know
if there is anything we should watch out for or if it causes any problems.
Regards,
-Arne
--
Hey Jody,
I realize you've been crazy busy and continent hoping so sorry to harp
on your over stressed self. I'm wondering for an update from you on
where we stand.
We are starting to block on two legal issues:
1) not having your letters sent out,
2) not having a formal
Hi Adrian,
Its partly my fault. He did a test run with me. And I've been
refusing to sign because I don't know what the line:
Dated ___ ("Effective Date") means.
Does it mean when I started working on Geotools?
Jesse
Le 25-Feb-08 à 2:26 PM, Adrian Custer a écrit :
> Hey Jody,
>
> I re
Yeah. It should be 'Date the form is filled in' or some such. And yes,
it's redundant with the date at the end. I'll have to look for better
wording.
Thanks for catching these hesitations. The more we avoid for others, the
better.
--adrian
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 15:21 -0800, Jesse Eichar wrote:
>
That is not really enought notice Arne; I would like to finish testing
my 3D GML genreation work and I am on an airplane until tuesday.
Jody
Arne Kepp wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> we're hoping to start the release process for GeoServer 1.6.1 tomorrow
> and release the new version on Wednesday.
>
>
Adrian Custer wrote:
> Hey Jody,
>
> I realize you've been crazy busy and continent hoping so sorry to harp
> on your over stressed self. I'm wondering for an update from you on
> where we stand.
>
>
> We are starting to block on two legal issues:
>
> 1) not having your letters sent out,
>
It seems odd to me this kind of development would go on our stable
branch. I mean... the only reason i can see for it is it is a feature
that people have asked for in uDig or GeoServer. And once more that
those projects have decided that it is necessary to do it on their
respective stable branc
Then let me hit you back with a point of "practical" programming:
Only introduce abstractions when its necessary as with abstractions you
sacrifice simplicity and readability. :)
While I agree with you that too often subclassing can be miss used, i am
not sure it makes sense to adopt a specific
Not sure if its related but this recently happened with a Geoserver
developer as well. Checking the user out in xircles seems that the
user's confluence settings are not even set.
Question: In the past have users had to set up a confluence account
separate of xircles? And then once xircles is s
I agree that it is not enough notice... but unstable development on
stable branch is a no no as well. Even when we have a need in geoserver
to get a new feature which is significant in terms of new geotools code
we always test it out on trunk first. And backport only when stable.
Jody Garnett w
Long time ago now, but I think signed up in both Confluence and on Jira,
then connected the two accounts through Xircles before a despot gave me
privileges.
-Arne
Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> Not sure if its related but this recently happened with a Geoserver
> developer as well. Checking the us
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> It seems odd to me this kind of development would go on our stable
> branch. I mean... the only reason i can see for it is it is a feature
> that people have asked for in uDig or GeoServer. And once more that
> those projects have decided that it is necessary to d
21 matches
Mail list logo
