[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2033) JDBCFeatureReader featuer building code limits scalability

2008-09-14 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
JDBCFeatureReader featuer building code limits scalability -- Key: GEOT-2033 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2033 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Reporte

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2034) Shapefile renderer reads all DBF attributes when only a subset is needed

2008-09-14 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Shapefile renderer reads all DBF attributes when only a subset is needed Key: GEOT-2034 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2034 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Imp

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-2035) Shapefile renderer needlessly clones style elements

2008-09-14 Thread Andrea Aime (JIRA)
Shapefile renderer needlessly clones style elements --- Key: GEOT-2035 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2035 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Andrea Aime

[Geotools-devel] First take on GridCoverage documentation

2008-09-14 Thread Adrian Custer
Hey all, We had hoped to generate this documentation earlier in the summer but better late than ... The page http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/08+Grid+Coverage and the first few subsections hold our first draft of an explanation of how the coverage module works at a programmatic level. Pro

Re: [Geotools-devel] First take on GridCoverage documentation

2008-09-14 Thread Michael Bedward
This is great - thanks Adrian ! I just had a very quick look and I've already learned something (that I don't have to go down to JAI level to do a crop). I'll read it properly later today and see if there's anything useful that I can contribute to it. I've been working on some raster algorithms

Re: [Geotools-devel] going back to -r30106 FAIL? Is our history gone ...

2008-09-14 Thread Jody Garnett
Adrian Custer wrote: > That said, > svn co -r 30106 http://svn.geotools.org/trunk > works perfectly for me. Of course it does not build because we depend on > geoapi snapshots and not releases which seems like an increasingly bad > idea from my point of view. But you know that already. > Than

Re: [Geotools-devel] First take on GridCoverage documentation

2008-09-14 Thread Michael Bedward
Reading the notes about operations from the perspective of a relative beginner, it's not clear to me what the reasons / pros / cons are for invoking an operation via Operations.DEFAULT (as with the resample example on the Use a GridCoverage page) versus using the DefaultProcessor.doOperation method

Re: [Geotools-devel] First take on GridCoverage documentation

2008-09-14 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks Adrian; I added a {children} macro to that page so people can see the contents. Jody Adrian Custer wrote: > Hey all, > > We had hoped to generate this documentation earlier in the summer but > better late than ... > > The page http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/08+Grid+Coverage > and