Hi all,
Playing with Parser and Filter Encoding I have a simple question concerning
Parser configuration.
I'm looking for a generic way to handle both gml2 and gml3 included in
filter I provide to my parser.
For that I can just define two parsers with specific configuration (ie
filter.v1_1.OGCCon
Hi Mathieu,
Unfortunately I don't really have a good answer for this. Probably the
only way would be if the xml document being parsed contained a
schemaLocation attribute. In GeoServer we face this problem with wfs.
When a WFS request comes in we need to figure out what version of wfs to
use t
Hi Andrea, thanks a lot for the insights.
please see comments below.
On Thursday 04 December 2008 17:03:04 Andrea Aime wrote:
> Gabriel Roldán ha scritto:
> > Hi Andrea,
> >
> > giving a run at simplifying filters for jdbc datastores (for instance,
> > postgis) I have some doubts on where it'd be
On Wednesday 03 December 2008 23:28:42 Jody Garnett wrote:
> Gabriel Roldán wrote:
> > understood.
> > But since my first goal was to port what currently is on
> > PostPreProcessFilterSplittingVisitor to non deprecated stuff what if I
> > move it to main so we can look at what's needed for fallbac
One other item:
- All committers will need to have OSGeo IDs.
- Beat the rush and get one now:
http://www.osgeo.org/osgeo_userid/
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Paul Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI, the migration will be tracked on this ticket:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket
Andrea and all,
I've attached a patch to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2182 for your
review, or if anyone else is interested in reviewing will be more than
welcome.
The comment on the issue already has a summary of what was accomplished, and
it survives a full build with -Dall and postgi
FYI, the migration will be tracked on this ticket:
http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/324
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Paul Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have initiated discussions with the OSGeo SAC and will be coming
> back with transition dates as soon as we know. We would like to
I have initiated discussions with the OSGeo SAC and will be coming
back with transition dates as soon as we know. We would like to move
SVN and WebDAV for sure, since they share logins. I was asked if you
had interest in Trac (since Trac and SVN go together like chocolate
and peanut butter).
P.
O
Not that I have an utter love of Jira but I think we are pretty tied to
it. For what it is worth I would not be against migrating to Trac but I
am not sure how others feel.
Paul Ramsey wrote:
> I have initiated discussions with the OSGeo SAC and will be coming
> back with transition dates as soo
