Yeah that is true... it needs the resolver for the schema stuff.
App-schema-resolver is a bit of a misnomer because it also contains
stuff that can be used independently of app-schema. It would actually
make a lot of sense to me to put the complex stuff in the same package
as the resolver.
On
Well it definitely belongs together I think, building features from xml
and building feature types from xsd.
On 11/13/2012 04:53 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Niels,
>
> that sounds great!
>
> What is the overlap with Adam Brown's complex builders in his
> ComplexFeature Parsing and Building S
On 14/11/12 21:35, Niels Charlier wrote:
> App-schema-resolver is a bit of a misnomer because it also contains
> stuff that can be used independently of app-schema.
Well, app-schema-resolver is a resolver for application schemas. If
anything is a misnomer, it is app-schema, which should be
compl
I tested this in a couple of different configurations which previously
revealed this issue:
- Tested with two chained RTs (Heatmap->Contour) and output in a different
CRS to input
- Tested with using PointStacker with a filter referencing attributes on
the source dataset
Everything looks like it'
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Martin Davis wrote:
> I tested this in a couple of different configurations which previously
> revealed this issue:
>
> - Tested with two chained RTs (Heatmap->Contour) and output in a different
> CRS to input
> - Tested with using PointStacker with a filter refe
