Hi Jody,
Thanks for the response. Could you possibly point me to some examples of
WCS XML parsing/encoding in GeoTools? Also, is there any documentation on
how to handle XML with GeoTools? Is there a standard way?
Thanks,
Jon
On 17 November 2012 14:42, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Often you will f
The docs for XML fun and games is here:
- http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/library/xml/internal/index.html
In particular the tutor
The objects are here (these are often EMF generated from schema):
- https://github.com/geotools/geotools/tree/master/modules/ogc/net.opengis.wcs
The bindi
> I just fixed a test compile failure in gt-webservice (unsupported; we
> build it on our Jenkins), replacing a size method with
> DataUtilities.count . Yes, *another* size method, who would have
> thought? :-)
>
>
measure twice, cut once.
> This cleanup was made much easier by your excellen
Hi,
in GeoServer we are going to implement a WCS 2.0 and as usual we need
the EMF model for the protocol.
I see the net.opengis.wcs already contains the bindings for wcs 1.0 and 1.1.
Is it ok to just add the wcs 2.0 model there, or do you think we should do
a WCS 2.0
specific module in unsupported
Hi,
the CSW EMF model and XSD bindings have been around for a while now and
it seems they are "done", no further modifications seem to be incoming.
I would like to graduate them in supported land on trunk, with me as the
maintainer of course.
The EMF model is pure model, so it has no tests, the XS
+1 from me
Ian
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.
P
Hi.
I work on OpenTripPlanner, a multimodal trip planner. We recently had
to integrate the National Elevation Dataset (NAVD88) and OpenStreetMap's
elevation data (WGS84). I hacked together some conversion code inside
OTP, but I think I might not be the only one with this problem.
I wonder if
I leave it to you, but i would be fine with just updating the existing
module, especially since eventually i think it makes more sense to merge it
and follow suite with wcs 1.0 and 1.1. To do this you will have to tweak
some stuff on model generation, basically renaming the ecore package to
wcs20,
+1
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Ian Turton wrote:
> +1 from me
>
> Ian
>
>
>
>
> --
> Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
> web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, data
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
> I leave it to you, but i would be fine with just updating the existing
> module, especially since eventually i think it makes more sense to merge it
> and follow suite with wcs 1.0 and 1.1. To do this you will have to tweak
> some stuff o
Hi,
Is there a class to do the following?
to replace an arraylist of Point2D with a set of Points between min and max
indices
Regards.
David--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web
David,
This list is for discussions directly relating to the development of
the GeoTools library only.
Michael
On 20 November 2012 03:25, David Shi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a class to do the following?
>
> to replace an arraylist of Point2D with a set of Points between min and max
> indices
>
Right. I would like to hear Ben's take but in general I don't think many of
the other models actually use the xlink model for anything other than the
purpose of generating their own initial model. So i would say if everything
compiles just change it in place as is. One thing that would be good is t
I think that is what OGC was hoping we would do - sine they tried to roll
this out without changing version numbers on their standards.
--
Jody Garnett
On 20/11/2012, at 11:04 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Right. I would like to hear Ben's take but in general I don't think many of
the other mode
14 matches
Mail list logo
