Re: [Geotools-devel] GML and XLink changes causing grief in WCS 2.0 validation

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Andrea do we have any chance of doing what the OGC wants? Ie cutting cold > turkey over to the new/official xlink schema (even for all the old > schemas?). > > I understand they have retroactively applied the official xlink schema to > all th

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML and XLink changes causing grief in WCS 2.0 validation

On 04/12/12 23:41, Andrea Aime wrote: > However, all the schemas in the main gml 3.2 are also different in some way, > thought I've not verified to what extent) When Justin created the original GML 3.2.1 bindings, he modified or removed several types in xsd files to break cyclic type definitions

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML and XLink changes causing grief in WCS 2.0 validation

Not sure what is actionalble out of this thread but would it help to update all of our internal schemas to the latest schemas that contain all the xlink fixes? Especially the gml 3.2 schema which seems to have factored out all the iso schema (gcd, gmx, etc...) On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Ben

Re: [Geotools-devel] GML and XLink changes causing grief in WCS 2.0 validation

On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Not sure what is actionalble out of this thread but would it help to > update all of our internal schemas to the latest schemas that contain all > the xlink fixes? Especially the gml 3.2 schema which seems to have factored > out all the is

[Geotools-devel] [Hudson] Hudson build is back to normal : geotools-8.x-nightly #153

See -- This message is automatically generated by Hudson. For more information on Hudson, see: http://hudson-ci.org/ -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime