Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal extended release schedule

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Looks like we have enough votes to proceed. Linked to the google doc. > > Filled in the release schedule: > > http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GeoTools+and+GeoServer+release+schedule > > Currently I have both individual branch schedule, and a

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] Modification on WMSTileFuser class

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > So I understand what is being proposed. I suppose my questions twofold a) > what is your time frame for this work and b) why 10.x ( since we are > nearing the 11.0)? > > As for moving code between projects, everything looks okay. For the > Ge

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal extended release schedule

I tried both sort orders, I liked seeing what was coming up. But yeah don't mind either way. I would like to keep only one copy of the schedule, so if the combined one works for you we can remove the "per branch" schedule. Ian only volunteered for the final release, so we still need a volunteer. W

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] Modification on WMSTileFuser class

I am always troubled by such questions, let me think. As the original contributor you can pick up the code and contribute it to another project. Since it is Nicola is doing the work, your +1 on the GeoServer list as a PSC will work out fine. That way the GeoServer list has a record that the reque

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal extended release schedule

I had only picked up the release but I can do the RC2 as well. Ian On 10 February 2014 08:17, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > >> Looks like we have enough votes to proceed. Linked to the google doc. >> >> Filled in the release schedule: >> >> http://

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal extended release schedule

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Ian Turton wrote: > I had only picked up the release but I can do the RC2 as well. > Now, that's quite generous of you, thanks! :-) Cheers Andrea -- == Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for more information == Ing. Andrea Aime

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] Modification on WMSTileFuser class

Ok I will send an email to the ML. Is there another feedback? Cheers, Nicola. 2014-02-10 12:37 GMT+01:00 Jody Garnett : > I am always troubled by such questions, let me think. > > As the original contributor you can pick up the code and contribute it to > another project. > > Since it is Nicol

[Geotools-devel] Feature Freeze and GEOT-4619 question.

Hi guys, Niels provided an improvement for the GeoTIFF reader, in order to support georeferencing information provided through MapInfo TAB files, as http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4619. With this improvement, there is a new MapInfoFileReader beside the WorldImageFileReader on gt-main. That re

[Geotools-devel] Proposal to backport code from GeoServer

Hi all, I would change the GeoWebCache WMSTileFuser class for making it more performant, but this operation requires to move some code to avoid cyclic dependencies. For this reason I would submit to the PSC a proposal of moving 2 packages of the GeoServer WMS module developed by Andrea Aime. The

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] Proposal to backport code from GeoServer

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Nicola Lagomarsini < nicola.lagomars...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Hi all, > > I would change the GeoWebCache WMSTileFuser class for making it more > performant, but this operation requires to move some code to avoid cyclic > dependencies. > > For this reason I wou

Re: [Geotools-devel] Two bugs for parsing ArcGIS Server 10.1 WFS GetFeature response

Thanks, Jody and Andrea! On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Allen Lin wrote: > >> Hi Jody, >> >> Thanks for pointing that out, though I am having two more questions: >> 1) What to be included in the test case? Says, for Parsing WFS GetFeature

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] Proposal to backport code from GeoServer

Thanks for the trouble guys :) Jody Garnett On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Nicola Lagomarsini < > nicola.lagomars...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I would change the GeoWebCache WMSTileFuser class for making it more >> perfor

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geowebcache-devel] Modification on WMSTileFuser class

Not from me, technically what you are doing is very clear cut. It would be good to hear back from GWC list as that appears to be the most effected (i.e. new functionality). Jody Garnett On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Nicola Lagomarsini < nicola.lagomars...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Ok I wil

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: geotools-master #154

See Changes: [jdeolive] Updated links for spatialite libs to new build server -- [...truncated 34315 lines...] [INFO] [install:install {execution: default-install}] [INFO] Installing

[Geotools-devel] changes to spatialite module

Hi all, Currently for the jdbc-spatialite module we depend on a patched version of the the xerial sqlite-jdbc driver: https://bitbucket.org/xerial/sqlite-jdbc https://bitbucket.org/jdeolive/sqlite-jdbc The reason we use a patched driver is so that we can compile spatialite into the sqlite sh

Re: [Geotools-devel] changes to spatialite module

Sounds like a great plan Justin, I especially like change of jdbc connection parameters. Jody Jody Garnett On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Justin Deoliveira < jdeol...@boundlessgeo.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently for the jdbc-spatialite module we depend on a patched version of > the the x

Re: [Geotools-devel] Feature Freeze and GEOT-4619 question.

Feels risky making a change this late in the game, but I am content to trust your judgement. If you do decide to go ahead, I would rather see this change done promptly to take part in RC2. Jody Jody Garnett On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Daniele Romagnoli < daniele.romagn...@geo-solutions