Re: [Geotools-devel] Deleting the unsupported coverage-multidim module

2016-07-22 Thread Simone Giannecchini
+1 on killing it. Daniele? Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584

Re: [Geotools-devel] Deleting the unsupported coverage-multidim module

2016-07-22 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
+1 for me too. Daniele On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > +1 on killing it. > > Daniele? > Regards, > Simone Giannecchini > == > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! > Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.

[Geotools-devel] Deleting the unsupported coverage-multidim module

2016-07-22 Thread Jim Hughes
Hi all, During the bug stomp, I looked into https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-4821 and noticed that the coverage-multidim module has a few issues (1). First, the geotiff bit depends on GeoTools 2.6-SNAPSHOT (and an gt-coverage-api-old module). Second, for the hdf4 Maven module, the

[Geotools-devel] Killing unsupported coveragetools module

2016-07-22 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Opinions? I am +1, since as far as I remember we don't use it anymore in the GT/GS codebase. Regards, Simone Giannecchini == GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Simone Giannecchini @simogeo Founder/Director GeoSolutions S.A.S

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5467) In memory evaluation of like filters with empty escape fails

2016-07-22 Thread Andrea Aime [Administrator] (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Andrea Aime [Administ

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-07-22 Thread Pierre Mauduit
Hi, > (perhaps due to lack of use). FYI we stumbled upon several issues with the classic wfs module in the geOrchestra extraction webapp (mainly related to basic-authentication being dropped across requests, but we are using a quite old geotools version too). We migrated to wfs-ng in february

Re: [Geotools-devel] Killing unsupported coveragetools module

2016-07-22 Thread Jody Garnett
Go for it -- Jody Garnett On 22 July 2016 at 06:51, Simone Giannecchini < simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote: > Opinions? > > I am +1, since as far as I remember we don't use it anymore in the > GT/GS codebase. > > Regards, > Simone Giannecchini > == > GeoServer Professional Services fr

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng vs wfs datastore fight!

2016-07-22 Thread Jody Garnett
Thanks for the positive feedback, Niels has a couple of pull requests ready and then we should be able to complete the "migration" ... perhaps later today! -- Jody Garnett On 22 July 2016 at 09:12, Pierre Mauduit wrote: > Hi, > > >> (perhaps due to lack of use). > > > > FYI we stumbled upon se

[Geotools-devel] [JIRA] (GEOT-5468) Kill coveragetools modules from unsupported land

2016-07-22 Thread Simone Giannecchini (JIRA)
Title: Message Title Simone Giannecchini c

Re: [Geotools-devel] gt-imagemosaic schema up to date?

2016-07-22 Thread Devon Tucker
Hi Daniele, That makes sense. I guess that raises the question of what to do with the XSD now. Should it go away, or should we attempt to update it to match the current generated objects? Does anyone actually use the XSD? On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Daniele Romagnoli < daniele.romagn...@geo-