[Geotools-devel] netcdf runtime dimension question

2016-09-23 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello Daniele, As you know, I am working on support for aggregation on runtime dimension in netcdf. I am now looking into what needs to happen in VariableAdaptor. I am very new at netcdf, so I do not yet understand everything that is happening to the fullest extent in this class. I have found

Re: [Geotools-devel] [netcdf-java] runtime aggregation

2016-09-23 Thread Niels Charlier
Simone, Daniele, Do you have an opinion on point (3) of this email? It seems that one of you have written the code that expects a chronological order of listed aggregation files. The logic is in https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/plugin/coverage-multidim/netcdf/src/main

Re: [Geotools-devel] netcdf runtime dimension question

2016-09-23 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Niels, Nuno fixed a bug in the NetCDF machinery a couple of days ago. (I have merged that PR right now). At the very beginning of the NetCDF development, we started to support what was able with the available NetCDF version (I thin 2.x or something similar... a very old one). Therefore the NetCD

Re: [Geotools-devel] [netcdf-java] runtime aggregation

2016-09-23 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Niels, On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Niels Charlier wrote: > Simone, Daniele, > > Do you have an opinion on point (3) of this email? > > It seems that one of you have written the code that expects a > chronological order of listed aggregation files. > > The logic is in https://github.com/

Re: [Geotools-devel] [netcdf-java] runtime aggregation

2016-09-23 Thread Niels Charlier
HI Daniele, Thank you for your quick response. Two remarks though - I do seem to get from your explanation that it can also be decreasing rather than increasing, which means it should at least be possible to work the other way around, which was the case here. There are only two files, the la

Re: [Geotools-devel] [netcdf-java] runtime aggregation

2016-09-23 Thread Daniele Romagnoli
Hi Niels, On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Niels Charlier wrote: > HI Daniele, > > Thank you for your quick response. > > Two remarks though > > - I do seem to get from your explanation that it can also be decreasing > rather than increasing, which means it should at least be possible to work >

Re: [Geotools-devel] netcdf runtime dimension question

2016-09-23 Thread Niels Charlier
Hi Daniele, Thanks for your answer. I understand it better now. My first goal was to get these aggregation files actually published. I can publish them by ignoring the runtime dimension, but of course, that does not create actual support to query the dimension. That is a way bigger task, that