Simone,
I've gone with the approach to right now implement this as a rendering
transformation. I took this approach because it is less invasive than the
other approaches and the operation can easily used as a raster process and
SLD. Let me know if you have any concerns.
Thanks,
John Schulz
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Simone Giannecchini <
simone.giannecch...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Chiming in late.
>
> My suggestions would be as follows:
> - implement the operation in the ImageWorker. Most/All the logic
> should stay here.
> - Add a new contrast enhancement
>
> Adding a rendering transformation later on for whatever reason would
> be very easy.
>
> That said, if you want to have full performance you might have to go
> down to implement the operation directly in JAI/JAI-Ext rather than
> combining various JAI operations; however, this is another story..
>
> Regards,
> Simone Giannecchini
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
> Visit http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
> ==
> Ing. Simone Giannecchini
> @simogeo
> Founder/Director
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via di Montramito 3/A
> 55054 Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
> mob: +39 333 8128928
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> ---
> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003
> Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
> nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate.
> Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del
> messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora
> riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo
> cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla
> distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema.
> Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte,
> distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità
> diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal
> D.Lgs. 196/2003.
>
> The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely
> for the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be
> confidential or proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of
> privacy act (Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New
> Data Protection Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any
> disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, or either
> dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except
> previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact immediately the sender by
> telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the information in this message
> that has been received in error. The sender does not give any warranty
> or accept liability as the content, accuracy or completeness of sent
> messages and accepts no responsibility for changes made after they
> were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail
> transmission, viruses, etc.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Torben Barsballe
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Ian Turton wrote:
> >>
> >> I think that how you expose this to the user depends on what you or they
> >> think the process is going to be used for.
> >>
> >> I lean towards the rendering transformation as I see it as a process to
> >> transform a raster into another one rather than an enhancement of the
> >> raster. But I'm not a raster expert and I've never come across this
> type of
> >> transformation before.
> >>
> >
> > To provide a bit of an alternate viewpoint, in the places I have seen
> > hue-rotate used it has been the same type of operation as
> > brightness/contrast or changing the saturation. This has generally not
> been
> > in a GeoSpatial context however, just general image transformations.
> >
> > Given that we are using a ContrastEnhancement for brightness / contrast,
> I
> > could completely understand using a similar Color Enhancement for hue
> > rotate.
> >
> > That said, I'm sure a rendering transform would be fine too.
> >
> > Torben
> >
> >
> >
> --
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > ___
> > GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
> >
>
>
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>