Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-10-04

2016-10-07 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 08/10/16 12:42, Jody Garnett wrote: release schedule updated, check if Alessandro and Andrea availability. >>> Updated where? I don't see changes in https://github.com/ >>> geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Release-Schedule >> Jody updated the volunteers for RC1 (Devon & Jody) but left the dates >>

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools / GeoServer Meeting 2016-10-04

2016-10-07 Thread Jody Garnett
> >> release schedule updated, check if Alessandro and Andrea availability. > > Updated where? I don't see changes in https://github.com/ > > geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Release-Schedule > > Jody updated the volunteers for RC1 (Devon & Jody) but left the dates > the same as an historical record.

[Geotools-devel] starting the 16-RC1 release train

2016-10-07 Thread Jody Garnett
Waiting on ares to finish cite tests, revisions are: - GeoTools: 39b274634fd86abcd2f17633b4b8f6d8df557398 - GWC: 43cc5c049af2bb815e8b51a619f1aa1b99640f6b - GeoServer: 2b0fa540c1b7e160e90ceb480d05c0bc48ba8b70 There is a draft geotools blog post for review, will need a hand release GWC.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modification suggestion to comparison filter functions

2016-10-07 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Go, I would actually scrap the contents of those functions entirely and make them delegate to the same named filter objects, that do already have the logic you're looking for. This is the base class, it has many subclasses for each comparison implementation:

[Geotools-devel] Modification suggestion to comparison filter functions

2016-10-07 Thread Sato, Go
Hello, This is my first post to this mailing list. My name is Go and I am working for a civil engineering firm developing web applications with GeoServer. Recently, I have bumped into an issue when building a SLD for GeoServer which is reported here in detail.

Re: [Geotools-devel] [netcdf-java] runtime aggregation

2016-10-07 Thread Niels Charlier
Hello Daniele, In the meantime, I have gotten feedback from the netcdf-java community that it is up to the user to put the aggregated files in the proper order. That still leaves us with the lack of support for decreasing order in geotools. I made a patch and added it to my aggregation