Re: [Geotools-devel] SWT Module

2019-10-28 Thread Ian Mayo
> You can try that out when adding yourself as the module maintainer in the SWT > module. Done: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/2642 ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Geotools-devel] SWT Module

2019-10-28 Thread Ian Mayo
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 11:20, Andrea Aime wrote: > > HI Ian, > CLA received, I've sent you an invitation to join the GeoTools organization, > that should > give you commit access (and thus also PR merge powers). You can try that out > when > adding yourself as the module maintainer in the SWT

Re: [Geotools-devel] SWT Module

2019-10-28 Thread Andrea Aime
HI Ian, CLA received, I've sent you an invitation to join the GeoTools organization, that should give you commit access (and thus also PR merge powers). You can try that out when adding yourself as the module maintainer in the SWT module. Cheers and welcome! Andrea On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:47

Re: [Geotools-devel] SWT Module

2019-10-24 Thread Jody Garnett
No pressure, the requirements are documentation example, test coverage and watching for bug reports On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:41 AM Ian Mayo wrote: > > Sounds great, please update the pom.xml. > > Sure, will add myself as a developer / module maintainer > > > We also need to confirm you have

Re: [Geotools-devel] SWT Module

2019-10-24 Thread Ian Mayo
> Sounds great, please update the pom.xml. Sure, will add myself as a developer / module maintainer > We also need to confirm you have commit access and have signed OSGeo > contribution stuff. I've sent off my CLA. I doubt if I have commit access. > The module is currently unsupported,

Re: [Geotools-devel] SWT Module

2019-10-24 Thread Jody Garnett
Sounds great, please update the pom.xml. We also need to confirm you have commit access and have signed OSGeo contribution stuff. The module is currently unsupported, perhaps you could work towards supported status? On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 5:46 AM andrea antonello wrote: > +1 from this side

Re: [Geotools-devel] SWT Module

2019-10-24 Thread andrea antonello
+1 from this side :-) > As a consumer of the SWT module, I'd like to volunteer to maintain it, > on the understanding that @Moovidia has generously volunteered to act > as backup maintainer. > > > ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list >

[Geotools-devel] SWT Module

2019-10-24 Thread Ian Mayo
As a consumer of the SWT module, I'd like to volunteer to maintain it, on the understanding that @Moovidia has generously volunteered to act as backup maintainer. ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Geotools-devel] SWT module

2018-10-24 Thread andrea antonello
> Is it a community module and you are the maintainer - so you can dump it if > you like. > > I had some hopes of making a bridge for uDig so it could use the renderer > without depending on JAI using this module; so I would ask you to keep it if > this is only a matter of warnings (and not

Re: [Geotools-devel] SWT module

2018-10-23 Thread Jody Garnett
Is it a community module and you are the maintainer - so you can dump it if you like. I had some hopes of making a bridge for uDig so it could use the renderer without depending on JAI using this module; so I would ask you to keep it if this is only a matter of warnings (and not failing the

[Geotools-devel] SWT module

2018-10-23 Thread andrea antonello
Hi all, we are looking at the SWT module for the java 11 migration. At the time the jdep analysis results in some issues coming from the swt libs: - Uses java desktop, see comments above: (there is hope for a fix though,