Yeah it is a pain, for a detailed breakdown on how the expectation changes
depending on protocol see:
https://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wfs/axis_order.html
The take home is if you see EPSG:4326 (and not the longer urn formats) is
to not trust it and look at the data.
The specific
Jody & Ian,
Thank you for enlightening me regarding EPSG:4326 and the link to the
documentation related to this.
In 30+ years in GIS, I've worked with WGS84 coordinates in longitude -
latitude order in shapefile, WKT, WKB and spatial data constructors. I had
assume that EPSG:4326 was just the emb
How does DB2 documentation have it?
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSEPEK_11.0.0/pdf/dasz_03_spatlbook.pdf
Looks like the have alter_cs and alter_crs so you can configure. Can you
check the definition in your database David?
Note “EPSG:4326” is ambiguous on axis order intended (dif
It sounds like the data is not actually in EPSG:4326 LAT/LON order then,
thus the renderer is getting confused by the fact that the CRS claims to be
a NORTH_EAST projection when the data isn't. In general avoid using
EPSG:4326 unless you are very sure that is what you have and you are sure
about th
