--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Downie
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; GEP-Ed
Subject: RE: Montreal and Kyoto Compared
Dear All:
Happy Wednesday. Thank you to Geoffrey for circulating the article and
starting this thread.
On fir
I took the liberty of passing on the postings to Cass. His two replies
are below.
regards, jim
p.s. In case you want to email Cass directly, his address is copied
above.
<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>-<>
Professor Jim Salzman
Duke Law School
Nicholas School of Environ
d
I'm sure the list will generate a million other good suggestions, so I'll
stop there. wil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of VanDeveer, Stacy
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 11:22 AM
To: Wil Burns; Paul Craig; GEP-Ed
Subject: RE:
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Maniates
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006
11:21 AM
To:
gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: RE: Montreal
and Kyoto
Compared
Just a quick piggy-backing onto Wil's comment: This is a great piece
for demonstrating the limited utility of the &q
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Geoffrey Wandesforde-Smith
Sent: Wed 8/30/2006 1:28 PM
To: 'GEP-Ed'
Subject: RE: Montreal and Kyoto Compared
I did write to Willett off-list and thank him for his comment. But just so
everyone understands, here's what I said:
"Thank
anta Clara, CA 95053 USA
Phone: 408.551.3000 x6139
Mobile: 650.281.9126
Fax: 408.554.2745
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul
Craig
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 9:52 AM
To: GEP-Ed
Subject: Re: Montreal and Kyot
Behalf Of Wil Burns
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 1:56 PM
To: 'Paul Craig'; 'GEP-Ed'
Subject: RE: Montreal and Kyoto Compared
Well, some parts of this aren't even based on "outdated" assumptions;
for
example, even the IPCC First Assessment Report didn
no Real, Loyola 101
Santa Clara, CA 95053 USA
Phone: 408.551.3000 x6139
Mobile: 650.281.9126
Fax: 408.554.2745
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Craig
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 9:52 AM
To: GEP-Ed
Subject: Re: M
probably most like to hear from you -- and probably most needs to -- is Cass
Sunstein.
Geoffrey.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Craig
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 9:52 AM
To: GEP-Ed
Subject: Re: Montreal and Kyoto Compared
Wi
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: Montreal and Kyoto Compared
Ok, an interesting comparison of national benefits from national versus
global implementation. But otherwise, wow, a bizarre article. Perhaps
an example of how
Ok, an interesting comparison of national benefits from national
versus global implementation. But otherwise, wow, a bizarre
article. Perhaps an example of how you cannot do good political
science if you base it on lousy climatology, old economic analysis,
and pretend that there's no su
11 matches
Mail list logo
