Re: RES: Dynamic proxies

2003-08-08 Thread a . vasconcelos
Not sure if I agree with this one, although I think it is mainly an academic issue. The way I read the spec the EAR IS indeed what sets the boundary of an application. The different JAR and WAR files set the boundaries for sub- systems and possibly business objects. In other words, differen

Re: RES: Dynamic proxies

2003-08-08 Thread a . vasconcelos
Ok ... I finaly now have both email addresses in the list :o) One example at a time. 1. Can you define "use" for me ? I think that making a remote call to an EJB deployed in a different EAR constitutes a "use" relationship right ? In that case number 1 is not a problem if you consider

Re: RES: Dynamic proxies

2003-08-08 Thread denes
No, this problem of libraries can be solved by the classloader itself. Denes Citando Craig Wohlfeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Wouldn't having a separate server configuration require a separate > runtime? It seems like a mistake to require another runtime for every > application that you have. The

Re: RES: Dynamic proxies

2003-08-08 Thread Craig Wohlfeil
Wouldn't having a separate server configuration require a separate runtime? It seems like a mistake to require another runtime for every application that you have. There is nothing precluding you from running multiple applications in a runtime but you have to be wary of collisions. This is part