[MERGED] osmo-bsc[master]: Structural reform: Get rid of osmo_bsc_sccp_con

2018-02-19 Thread Harald Welte
Harald Welte has submitted this change and it was merged. Change subject: Structural reform: Get rid of osmo_bsc_sccp_con .. Structural reform: Get rid of osmo_bsc_sccp_con There was always a 1:1 correspondence between

osmo-bsc[master]: Structural reform: Get rid of osmo_bsc_sccp_con

2018-02-19 Thread Harald Welte
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/6542 To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-MessageType: comment Gerrit-Change-Id: Idd2b733477ee90d24dec369755a00f1c39c93f39 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc Gerrit-Branch: master

[PATCH] osmo-bsc[master]: Structural reform: Get rid of osmo_bsc_sccp_con

2018-02-16 Thread dexter
Hello Jenkins Builder, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/6542 to look at the new patch set (#2). Structural reform: Get rid of osmo_bsc_sccp_con There was always a 1:1 correspondence between gsm_subscriber_connection and osmo_bsc_sccp_con, so

[PATCH] osmo-bsc[master]: Structural reform: Get rid of osmo_bsc_sccp_con

2018-02-16 Thread dexter
Review at https://gerrit.osmocom.org/6542 Structural reform: Get rid of osmo_bsc_sccp_con There was always a 1:1 correspondence between gsm_subscriber_connection and osmo_bsc_sccp_con, so there's really no point in having two separate dynamically allocated data structures with pointers back