Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1
> Could you comment why both l1ctl_info_dl and l1ctl_burst_ind sizes
> have to be added? Ideally - right next to the #define to make sure
> we update this properly next time as well.
This is a question to the commit author.
I just realized that this change is unrelat
Vadim Yanitskiy has abandoned this change.
Change subject: firmware/l23_api.c: increase the L3_MSG_SIZE
..
Abandoned
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/6251
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Patch Set 1: Code-Review-1
Could you comment why both l1ctl_info_dl and l1ctl_burst_ind sizes have to be
added? Ideally - right next to the #define to make sure we update this properly
next time as well.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/6251
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.os
Review at https://gerrit.osmocom.org/6251
firmware/l23_api.c: increase the L3_MSG_SIZE
This one defines the fixed amount of memory we will allocate for
each new l23 message in the firmware. Since the BURST INDICATION
message was defined, data_ind is no longer the biggest message.
Change-Id: I2
