Re: GiP-2.95-develop & list archives

Hi John, > What's happening is that the programme that began as 50 half-frames > (i.e. fields) is now being sent as 50 full frames per second, with > interpolation being used to create the missing lines. Does this explain why I normally see BBC credits as double-vision when I pause; every one

Re: GiP-2.95-develop & list archives

Thanks for this info. Disk space aside, and frame rate aside, is the picture quality better if you use "best" with 2.95? (I would be plugging this into WebPVR and using quick URL) On 7 April 2016 at 19:41, Vangelis forthnet wrote: > On Thu Apr 7 12:09:34 BST 2016,

Re: GiP-2.95-develop & list archives

On Thu Apr 7 12:09:34 BST 2016, artisticforge . wrote: I spent part of yesterday reading the list archives and have a better understanding now as to why GiP-2.95-dev is so slow. (snip) interesting reading the archives. Hello terry :-) (I do hope the pain relievers are still doing their job

Re: GiP-2.95-develop & list archives

On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:26:32 +0100, Paul Phillips wrote: >> Nearly all downloads are hls with two to four times the bit rate. >> Part of that slowness is from perl doing a main part of the work. Having started on the 'net with dialup @ 2400 baud setting something going and letting it get on with

Re: GiP-2.95-develop & list archives

Is the picture quality better then and would you recommend it? I use web PVR On 7 April 2016 at 12:09, artisticforge . wrote: > Hello > > I spent part of yesterday reading the list archives and have a better > understanding now as to why GiP-2.95-dev is so slow. Nearly

GiP-2.95-develop & list archives

Hello I spent part of yesterday reading the list archives and have a better understanding now as to why GiP-2.95-dev is so slow. Nearly all downloads are hls with two to four times the bit rate. Part of that slowness is from perl doing a main part of the work. interesting reading the archives.