DirectX and here's my attempt at a FAQ :)

1999-12-15 Thread teunis
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Jon M. Taylor wrote: On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, teunis wrote: And many of the interfaces developed (ping/pong buffers as an example) are either currently unusable or not really tested all that much. I'd -love- to see some sort of formal FAQ/RFC on this issue...

Re: Unidentified subject!

1999-12-15 Thread becka
Hi ! I am running debian, so i installed the libggi2 package, and the libgii package, etc. Then i went to put kgi in my kernel. I found framebufferconsole (fbcon) support, and thought that kgi stuff was renamed to fbcon, so i selected it for my ATI mach64 PCI video card. (selected vesa

KGI vs KGIcon vs fbcon confusion (was Re: Unidentified subject!)

1999-12-15 Thread Firstname Lastname
Well. Concerning this issue, currently, with GGI: you do not need to patch your kernel, but you can of course if you really insist in doing it. It may sound funny, but, in fact: - KGIcon is a bridge that allows to use KGI (1998 version) drivers within the context of the (now standard) linux

Re: Unidentified subject!

1999-12-15 Thread Firstname Lastname
Anyway, my system booted and i got the penguin on bootup, and figured all must be working just peachy... then i went to run heretic as a demo... My screen started jumping, and my monitors menu had a cow. It reported that the video card was trying to refresh at 214Hz. If you use a

Re: KGI vs KGIcon vs fbcon confusion (was Re: Unidentified subject!)

1999-12-15 Thread Brian S. Julin
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Firstname Lastname wrote: ok, I'm fuzzy here. if libggi can use KGI or fbcon, then why make a KGIcon driver (differnt fron the KGI driver) which redirects KGI calls to fbcon calls? kgicon is a way to use KGI drivers without patching the kernel, by having them emulate