On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Christoph Egger wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
James Simmons wrote:
It is really cool that things like Berlin are being developed, but there
is no software for it. No office tools, no scientific software, no games,
nothing but a
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, John McCutchan wrote:
Is it just me, or does writing /dev/gfx from scratch while KGI 0.9 is
accomplishing the same thing, and is (correct me if im wrong) complete.
For a linux graphics revolution which I want very much. We can't
afford to
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Antonio Campos wrote:
Christoph Egger wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Antonio Campos wrote:
_I_ *know*, from long personal experience, that it is not. Our
code is good enough to speak for itself now. If you want to help GGI to
succeed, do it by
"Jon M. Taylor" wrote:
* Who will maintain KGI in the kernel?
The current maintainers, plus other people who will see it
distributed with the kernel sources and become a contributor in the grand
free software tradition. That's the way it usually works.
I
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Steffen Seeger wrote:
"Jon M. Taylor" wrote:
* Who will maintain KGI in the kernel?
The current maintainers, plus other people who will see it
distributed with the kernel sources and become a contributor in the grand
free software tradition.
indeed. So wouldn't this make a nice point on GGI's own TODO list ? Being able to run
all KDE on top of GGI would be wonderful, wouldn't it ?
This would be very nice :-)
