i found int ggiCrossBlit(ggi_visual *src, int sx, int sy,
int sw, int sh, ggi_visual *dst, int dx, int dy);
which has compiler dependend sizes.
is this intended ?
Yes. Compilers set int size to be the data size that is most efficient to
handle.
ggi won't work on a 8 bit computer
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Erik Thiele wrote:
i found int ggiCrossBlit(ggi_visual *src, int sx, int sy,
int sw, int sh, ggi_visual *dst, int dx, int dy);
which has compiler dependend sizes.
is this intended ?
I think the question's been asked and decided it should stay that way.
ggi won't work
