On 13/02/13 07:06, wren ng thornton wrote:
On 2/12/13 3:37 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
One reason for the major version bumps is that base is a big
conglomeration of modules, ranging from those that hardly ever change
(Prelude) to those that change frequently (GHC.*). For example, the new
IO
* Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com [2013-02-13 09:00:15+]
It's feasible to split base, but to a first approximation what you
end up with is base renamed to ghc-base, and then the new base
contains just stub modules that re-export stuff from ghc-base.
It would be great to have a portable
Hi Simon,
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
simo...@microsoft.comwrote:
** **
Yes do point me to where the check for deriving(Typeable) is awkard to
test against AutoDeriveTypeable.
I add the instances in line 319 of TcDeriv. It's easy to add them here,
because I just
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:00:15AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
I believe Ian has done some experiments with splitting base further,
so he might have more to add here.
There are some sensible chunks that can be pulled out, e.g. Foreign.*
can be pulled out into a separate package fairly easily
Somebody claiming to be Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
* Simon Marlow marlo...@gmail.com [2013-02-13 09:00:15+]
It's feasible to split base, but to a first approximation what you
end up with is base renamed to ghc-base, and then the new base
contains just stub modules that re-export stuff from
On 2/13/13, Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org
Fixed bootstrap failure on linux for --target=mingw32
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org
---
configure.ac | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I haven't seen Michael's patches (where are they btw?), but there is
some extra work to be done to ensure that 256-bit values are passed in
registers. Otherwise adding support for wider vector types is fairly
straightforward.
The current plan is for 256-bit wide vector primops to always be
Hello,
Source Code Comments decribe wrong (old) option name in two place.
I made patch to fix that.
Best Regards,
--
shelarcy shelarcyhotmail.co.jp
http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/
0001-Fix-comment-to-use-correct-option-name.patch
Description: Binary data
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:47:40 +0100
Gabor Greif ggr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/13, Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org
Fixed bootstrap failure on linux for --target=mingw32
Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org
---
