Hi,
With the number of jobs. ie, on my laptops A8-3500M that's -j4.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Niklas Larsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Are you using make -j with or without number of jobs? I tried with make
> -j4 on my Windows 8 machine and it worked well.
>
> Niklas
>
>
> 2013/8/27 Kyle Van Bere
Hi!
Are you using make -j with or without number of jobs? I tried with make -j4
on my Windows 8 machine and it worked well.
Niklas
2013/8/27 Kyle Van Berendonck
> Hi Simon,
>
> I think this is a MinGW bug. If we're talking about the same bug (lockup,
> no console output, task manager shows cp
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Carter Schonwald
wrote:
> what version of Xcode do you have installed?
Sorry, that was meant to only cross-link the original report from
April to the new thread, and this is all happening on Linux.
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>>
>> On
what version of Xcode do you have installed?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Tuncer Ayaz
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Tuncer Ayaz
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Kazu Yamamoto wrote:
> >> > > Same error fo
Hi Simon,
I think this is a MinGW bug. If we're talking about the same bug (lockup,
no console output, task manager shows cpu but it doesn't produce files,
etc) I get it when building other projects with -j too and I don't think
its GHC's fault.
Regards,
Kyle Van Berendonck
_
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Kazu Yamamoto wrote:
>> > > Same error for me on Linux:
>> > > http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/2013-March/000835.html
>> > > http://www.haskell.
On 27 Aug 2013 19:59, "Edward Z. Yang" wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Simon Marlow's message of Sun Aug 25 12:56:06 -0700 2013:
> > You can arrange that all the indirections end up next to each other by
> > putting them in a special section. Then you can traverse the contents
> > of the section so long
I think the last time 'make install' worked for me was sometime in
February or March 2013. The build succeeds but 'make install' fails.
Is this normal?
git rev ef01794
linux i386
glibc 2.18
gcc 4.8.1
mk/build.mk:
BuildFlavour = perf
V = 0
$ perl boot
$ ./configure --prefix=/tmp/ghc/7.7.20130827
Austin also raises an important point:
Its high time we explore changes to the ABI/per architecture calling
convention and how they might impact performance.
I think this is something worth exploring after the 7.8 release
(but not in the next month of prerelease engineering, though I need to sus
Well, depending on ./configure is reasonable, but I'm not sure how to
easily make it work around these checks just for the 'show' target.
Hm, what platform is this, Win64? (I need to get a win64 test env up.)
You might possibly have an out of date mk/build.mk file, but if this
is a recent checkout
ha ha!
bash$ make show VALUE=GhcProfiled
Makefile:39: mk/config.mk: No such file or directory
Makefile:41: *** Please run ./configure first. Stop.
===
OK, so I did "perl boot; ./configure". Then
bash$ make show VALUE=GhcProfiled
make -r --no-print-directory -f ghc.mk show
ghc.mk:158
To do this, IMO we'd also really have to start shipping our own copy
of LLVM. The current situation (use what we have configured or in
$PATH) won't really become feasible later on.
On platforms like ARM where there is no NCG, the mismatches can become
super painful, and it makes depending on certa
I think there are a couple of things that are worth exposing. Looking
at Luite's patch, for example, there are a few that a basic high-level
platform wouldn't solve. A few things an API might reasonably want to
customise:
- Parse custom flags (when wrapping GHC)
- Hook into GHC's compilatio
On 26/08/13 10:00, Jan Stolarek wrote:
1. This adds a new constraint on the dataflow algorithm, namely that it
must traverse the blocks in the correct order.
I don't follow. From what I've seen in the code Hoopl orders blocks using
depth-first traversal.
For backwards analysis it reverses that
I've compared what versions current GHC HEAD uses w/ vs. what's
currently available on Hackage (see below);
So currently, the following packages have newer versions available on
hackage than are used in GHC HEAD:
- binary
- containers
- primitive
- time
- vector
In order to clarify a point
I was actually looking at this exact code very recently since I was
fixing the build system with Stage1Only a little last night.
We do something like this in ./ghc.mk:
define addExtraPackage
ifeq "$2" "-"
# Do nothing; this package is already handled above
I try "sh validate" with profiled libraries and get
libraries/dph/ghc.mk:134: *** Cannot build profiled GHC with DPH; try deleting
libraries/dph and trying again. Stop.
So I obediently remove libraries/dph, and try again. But that fails too:
Error: libraries/dph/LICENSE doesn't exist.
Maybe you
Hello Yoshikuni,
Thanks for submitting a patch!
The best way to get your patch accepted is to use the GHC Trac system
accessible here: http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/ReportABug
Create a bug report for the problem that you have, and then post your patch to
it. The Trac system makes it muc
I have a nice new 64-bit Windows 8 laptop. But when I say
make -j2
then it launches a couple processes (which I think complete fine) and then
locks up with 'make' consuming 25-35% of a CPU, but nothing happening. No
further activity for 30 mins.
This is msys 'make', version 3.81
I’m sympathetic to supporting GHCJS. But, as described in my email, there
seems to be several different proposals for extending plugins swirling around,
and I’m not sure how they relate to each other.
My suggestion (for you guys to lead ☺):
· Identify the minimum necessary for GHCJS in
20 matches
Mail list logo
