Re: Releasing containers 0.5.3.2 -- before GHC 7.8?

On 2014-01-14 at 17:41:48 +0100, Ryan Newton wrote: > I'm wondering if we can do a hackage release of 0.5.3.2? That "splitRoot" > function is in there, and my ability to deploy parallel code that uses > containers depends on people getting it! Are there any other changes since > 0.5.3.1? > > Repl

Re: PLT Redex definition of STG as per fast curry paper

Neat! I wish we'd had this a couple of years ago when Dylan Lukes was playing around with his STG-like toy. -Edward On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Edward Z. Yang wrote: > For those of you who aren't following the commit list, I've just pushed > a PLT Redex de

Re: PLT Redex definition of STG as per fast curry paper

Very cool! Thanks for sharing! On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Edward Z. Yang wrote: > For those of you who aren't following the commit list, I've just pushed > a PLT Redex definition for an STG-like > language as was defined in the fast curry paper. This langu

PLT Redex definition of STG as per fast curry paper

For those of you who aren't following the commit list, I've just pushed a PLT Redex definition for an STG-like language as was defined in the fast curry paper. This language is *not* STG. The hope is that this will be a good starting point for actually formalizing

RE: [Haskell-cafe] GHC API: runStmt not taking into account reloaded module

Great. Any chance you could add a section to http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC/As_a_library to elucidate this point. It's not an easy API, and we know for sure that this particular point has tripped at least one person up. Simon From: JP Moresmau [mailto:jpmores...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 Jan

RE: Extending fold/build fusion

Akio Aha! So you are really talking about replacing the *entire* foldr/build story with a new one, namely a foldW/buildW story. Presumably all producers and consumers (map, filter, take, drop etc) must be redefined using foldW and buildW instead of fold and build. Is that right? That is muc

Re: [Haskell-cafe] GHC API: runStmt not taking into account reloaded module

While writing a smaller test case, I managed to get a different error, which in turn allowed me to find this: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2008-May/014841.html. It turns out I had the ghcLink session flag set to NoLink, it works fine with LinkInMemory! I knew it was someth

RE: Pattern synonyms for 7.8?

I think that's fine. But yes, the REPL does support top-level declarations. Simon | -Original Message- | From: ghc-devs [mailto:ghc-devs-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Dr. | ERDI Gergo | Sent: 15 January 2014 11:27 | To: Austin Seipp | Cc: Joachim Breitner; GHC Devs | Subject: Re: Pat

Re: Pattern synonyms for 7.8?

On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Austin Seipp wrote: 3) It seems GHCi does not support declaring pattern synonyms at the REPL. I'm not sure if it's intentional, but if it goes in like this, please be sure to document it in the release notes. We can file a ticket later for supporting pattern synonyms at the R

RE: ghci verbosity

Ha ha! Fixing... | -Original Message- | From: Herbert Valerio Riedel [mailto:hvrie...@gmail.com] | Sent: 14 January 2014 14:58 | To: Simon Peyton Jones | Cc: ghc-devs@haskell.org | Subject: Re: ghci verbosity | | Hello Simon, | | On 2014-01-14 at 14:59:55 +0100, Simon Peyton Jones wrote

Re: [Haskell-cafe] GHC API: runStmt not taking into account reloaded module

Thanks Simon, I will write a simple test case and see what happens. JP On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Simon Peyton Jones wrote: > That sounds odd. Can you make a small reproducible test case, open a > ticket, and attach the test? > > > > Thanks > > > > SImon > > > > *From:* Haskell-Cafe [m

RE: [Haskell-cafe] GHC API: runStmt not taking into account reloaded module

That sounds odd. Can you make a small reproducible test case, open a ticket, and attach the test? Thanks SImon From: Haskell-Cafe [mailto:haskell-cafe-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of JP Moresmau Sent: 14 January 2014 20:14 To: Haskell Cafe Subject: [Haskell-cafe] GHC API: runStmt not taking