Will it include the latest commit to haddock? It solves this:
http://trac.haskell.org/haddock/ticket/292. This can greatly improve
performance of haddock in some situations (when a project is built with
--split-obj flag).
Cheers,
Kyra
On 3/25/2014 01:36, Austin Seipp wrote:
Hello all,
As
On 2014-03-25 at 09:28:57 +0100, Andreas Abel wrote:
[...]
You might wanna pull the break before the release.
Fwiw, reverting the new syntax at this point also has an effect on
already officially released libraries such as
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/containers-0.5.5.1 which started
The degree to which we believe this partially is important: If we are willing
to believe that the only library writers we care about doing this are those in
the core, then fine. In this case we shouldn't feel compelled to suggest to
library writers that they annotate, ever. I'm good with this.
On 3/25/2014 19:11, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
That commit is not in 2.14.1. Do you have any benchmarks to show the
speedup? If the commit does some significant speedup, I'm not against
backporting it into Haddock released with 7.8.2 (and there is at least
1 other fix I want to get into 7.8.2)
On 25/03/14 16:18, kyra wrote:
On 3/25/2014 19:11, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
That commit is not in 2.14.1. Do you have any benchmarks to show the
speedup? If the commit does some significant speedup, I'm not against
backporting it into Haddock released with 7.8.2 (and there is at least
1
On 3/25/2014 20:52, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
The only instances of Haddock becoming really slow that I can think of
is some rather old ticket (#101 on Haddock Trac) in presence of Template
Haskell but I have closed it a while ago due to lack of information to
go on and inability to replicate
On 25/03/14 17:09, kyra wrote:
On 3/25/2014 20:52, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
The only instances of Haddock becoming really slow that I can think of
is some rather old ticket (#101 on Haddock Trac) in presence of Template
Haskell but I have closed it a while ago due to lack of information to
go
Hello all,
As an updated, I'm looking into the report Mateusz had of 'free'
failing to build haddocks on OS X*, which I've reproduced. It seems
nasty - I'll follow up with details ASAP.
* See his recent email to ghc-devs about this problem.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk
Hi Mark,
I appreciate your analysis in terms of classes of users -- I think that is
helpful for framing the discussion.
About transitivity: I think we're in the clear here. Let's say package A
exports types missing role annotations. If package B imports package A and
wants to have the full
