Looks like I broke the build. Fixing eom

___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Re: Looks like I broke the build. Fixing eom

Should be fixed by 838bfb2. Sorry about the breakage. On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.comwrote: ___ ghc-devs mailing list ghc-devs@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs

Re: Looks like I broke the build. Fixing eom

Hi Johan, back from a holiday, so time to report CI failures... Am Samstag, den 29.03.2014, 11:36 +0100 schrieb Johan Tibell: Should be fixed by 838bfb2. Sorry about the breakage. according to https://travis-ci.org/nomeata/ghc-complete/builds/21818785 there are still 416 unexpected

Re: Looks like I broke the build. Fixing eom

Let me take a second look. The code validates on OS X so I'm fixing a bit blind here. On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Joachim Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.dewrote: Hi Johan, back from a holiday, so time to report CI failures... Am Samstag, den 29.03.2014, 11:36 +0100 schrieb Johan

Re: Looks like I broke the build. Fixing eom

I'm validating a fix. On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.comwrote: Let me take a second look. The code validates on OS X so I'm fixing a bit blind here. On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Joachim Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de wrote: Hi Johan, back from

Re: Looks like I broke the build. Fixing eom

I fixed some more missing symbols. If this doesn't do it I'll have to reproduce it on a Linux machine tomorrow and fix it there. On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.comwrote: I'm validating a fix. On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Johan Tibell