Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 20.07.2014, 22:57 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang:
Since this patch causes GHC HEAD to not bootstrap out of the box
from GHC 7.6, I've reverted it for now. We'll have to cross
this bridge sometime though.
thanks.
Cabal already has applied the patch to make the initial
Hello *,
We need to be sorting out tickets for 7.10.1. Last week, I spent some
time remilestoning things to get them into the rough correct places
(roughly), but we all need some help to get an idea of what we should
fix for the release.
Here's a query to look at:
Hello *,
Here are some updates from this past week.
- I sent an email earlier about 7.10.1 tickets - please vote on them!
- Related to that - as I said last week, I finished remilestoning a
lot of tickets, but more remain. Please excuse any mail spam, but do
pay attention to your bugs if they
On 18/07/2014 08:59, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 18.07.2014, 08:38 +0100 schrieb Simon Marlow:
I might be misremembering, but I believe someone (Ross Paterson?) used
to do this a while ago.
I can't think of any good reasons it *shouldn't* work.
Then, next question: Is it
Hello all,
As you may have noticed, I've been knocking around GHC and Cabal the
past few weeks. One of the tasks that has been on my list is
essentially reimplementing Philipp Schuster's 2012 GSoC, with a few
small but important architectural differences. Here is a status report
of what is
This is great! Can it do alerts, e.g. send a mail to the list when a
metric moves by a certain amount?
Cheers,
Simon
On 16/07/2014 09:02, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
I guess it’s time to talk about this, especially as Richard just brought
it up again...
I felt that we were seriously
Great. Thanks all for your help!
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Austin Seipp aus...@well-typed.com wrote:
Thanks Niklas, this is now committed.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Niklas Larsson metanik...@gmail.com wrote:
I posted a working and tested patch last night. Please feel free to
On 19/07/2014 06:00, Kyle Van Berendonck wrote:
I found these:
https://github.com/ghc/ghc/blob/5f3c5384df59717ca8013c5df8d1f65692867825/includes/rts/Constants.h#L194
They go only 0-14, so there's some long chains of branches and stuff in
hot paths that could be cleaned up into single -masked
Hi,
Am Montag, den 21.07.2014, 18:43 +0100 schrieb Edward Z.Yang:
In my copy of GHC and Cabal [1,2], you can now install multiple copies of a
package with differing dependencies to the package database, i.e. q-1.0
compiled against p-1.0, and against p-2.0. The packages in the database
are
Hi,
Am Montag, den 21.07.2014, 20:30 +0100 schrieb Simon Marlow:
This is great! Can it do alerts, e.g. send a mail to the list when a
metric moves by a certain amount?
no (or not yet). Large deviations are listed in the summary on
http://ghcspeed-nomeata.rhcloud.com/, and I try to keep an
Hi Simon,
I have been inspecting what gcc generates and found that in all the
functions I checked which used the thread status in a switch, none of them
generated jump tables, rather, long chains of cmp's.
I predict this is because there are overlapping cases (or even a
fall-through in one I
On 18 July 2014 09:01, Joachim Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de wrote:
Am Freitag, den 18.07.2014, 07:25 + schrieb Simon Peyton Jones:
| On Saturday 6th September is the Haskell Implementers Workshop. There
| has been plenty of discussion over the last 12 months about making
|
On a related front... I don't have a talk to give (hence I didn't submit a
proposal)... But I'd love it if some of us could have a group discussion
about coordinating releases, and our approach to putting out Haskell:
In short, we see it as several related peices (GHC, Cabal, Haddock, core
libs,
2014-07-21 21:31 GMT+02:00 Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com:
Great. Thanks all for your help!
I am afraid we are not done with this yet. Yesterday I have also
committed the fix for the FreeBSD platform, but today I noticed that
the corresponding test case (AtomicPrimops) is failing due to
14 matches
Mail list logo
