Hi all,
I wanted to see a side-by-side diff of the GHC code between 7.8.2 and 7.8.3.
So, I went to Phab's Diffusion application. I can access the different commits
I wish to compare, but I can't seem to find a "Compare" or "Diff" button.
Any hints?
Thanks!
Richard
_
Oo. Then it's possibly debris leftover from Austin's initial clang
compatibility work predating the improvements via the settings file work.
I'm Afk right now, but that probably can be safely removed from ghc,
especially since the configure script for clang cpp adds that anyways now I
think?
On 08/11/14 11:18 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote:
why should this flag be passed to cpp when invoked on HS files? It'd be
easy to expose another field in the settings file for this other
invokecation.. though i should look more closely at the use site before
opinining :)
Hmm, isn't doCpp function w
why should this flag be passed to cpp when invoked on HS files? It'd be
easy to expose another field in the settings file for this other
invokecation.. though i should look more closely at the use site before
opinining :)
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Karel Gardas
wrote:
> On 08/11/14 08:48
On 08/11/14 08:48 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote:
What i'm hearing you say is we actually need TWO sets of CPP flags, one
for normal haskell, and another for the CPP used on the assembler?
wheres this hardcoding?
DriverPipeline.hs -- grep for "assembler-with-cpp" and you will find it.
IMHO best wo
What i'm hearing you say is we actually need TWO sets of CPP flags, one for
normal haskell, and another for the CPP used on the assembler?
wheres this hardcoding?
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-d
On 08/11/14 02:32 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
Hmm, seeing CPPHS give me an idea about either
- prioritizing CPPHS usage, when configure detects CPPHS availability it
is then set as with --with-hs-cpp option and used as a preprocessor
https://phabricator.haskell.org/D142 -- implements this option
On 08/11/14 01:27 AM, Carter Schonwald wrote:
I could be wrong, but I think assembler-with-cpp came up only as part of
certain clang work arounds,
it should suffice to use any GCC like traditional mode CPP (like the
CPPHS tool).
This is interesting, but it looks like -x assembler-with-cpp is
